Journal Information
Vol. 8. Issue 44.
Pages 209-214 (September - October 1994)
Vol. 8. Issue 44.
Pages 209-214 (September - October 1994)
Open Access
Evolución de la Tasa de Cesáreas en España: 1984–1988
Evolution of Cesarean Section Rates in Spain: 1984–1988
Visits
4850
Antonio Sarría Santamera1,*, Juan Manuel Sendra Gutiérrez2
1 Subdirección General de Epidemiología. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Madrid. Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences. Dartmouth Medical School. Hanover
2 Servicio de Medicina Preventiva. Hospital Ntra. Sra. Sonsoles. Ávila
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es describir la evolución de las tasas en España. Las tasas nacionales aumentan de 9,42% en 1984 a 12,99% en 1988. La tendencia es significativamente creciente a nivel nacional y en todas las Comunidades. Las diferencias regionales están disminuyendo (el CSV pasa de 1,71 a 1,09) porque se están consolidando dos grupos de regiones: uno con tasas altas y otro con tasas bajas. La tasa es significativamente superior en los hospitales no públicos (14,33%). Estas diferencias reflejarían la controversia o incertidumbre en sus indicaciones y la influencia de factores organizativos. Aunque hay que conseguir fuentes de información y calcular tasas poblacionales ajustadas por características clínicas y sociodemográficas y estudios de resultados, estas desigualdades permiten sospechar la existencia de un diferencial entre la calidad teórica de la ciencia médica y la que ofrece la práctica médica explicable por causas ajenas a factores clínicos.

Palabras clave:
Cesárea
Factores clínicos
Tasas poblacionales
Summary

The objective of this work is to describe the evolution of cesarean section rates in Spain from 1984 through 1988. National rates increased from 9.92% to 19.99%. Trend is significantly rising nationwide and in all Communities. Overall differences have decreased (CSV from 1.73 to 11.72) because there are two groups of regions: one with high rates, the other one with low rates. Rates are significantly higher in private hospitals (14.53%). These differences could show the controversy and uncertainty in the indications and the influence of organizational factors. Although new sources of information to obtain population rates and outcomes studies adjusted by women clinic and sociodemografic characteristics are due to be developed, these differences lead to suspect that there is a gap between the theoric quality medical science could provide and the actual quality medical practice is providing, explained just by reasons out from clinical factors.

Key words:
Cesarean section
Clinical factors
Population rates
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
F.C. Notzon, P.J. Placek, S.M. Taffel.
Comparison of national cesarean section rates.
N Engl J Med, 316 (1987), pp. 386-389
[2.]
L.J. Dunn.
Cesarean section and other obstetric operations.
Obstetrics Gynecology, 5ª ed,
[3.]
L. McCloskey, D.B. Petiti, C.J. Hobel.
Variations in the use of cesarean delivery for dystocia: lessons about the source of care.
Med Care, 30 (1992), pp. 126-135
[4.]
G.L. Goyert, S.F. Bottoms, M.C. Treadwell, P.C. Nehra.
The physician factor in cesarean section rates.
N Engl J Med, 320 (1989), pp. 706-709
[5.]
K.H. Sheehan.
Cesarean section for dystocia: a comparison of practices in two countries.
Lancet, 7 (1987), pp. 548-551
[6.]
J.B. Gould, B. Davey, R.S. Stafford.
Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.
N Engl J Med, 321 (1989), pp. 233-239
[7.]
R.S. Stafford.
Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California Hospital Discharge Abstracts.
Am J Public Health, 80 (1990), pp. 313-315
[8.]
D.M. Oleske, G.L. Glandon, G.J. Giacomelli, S.F. Hohman.
The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.
Health Serv Res, 26 (1991), pp. 325-337
[9.]
V.A. Kazandjian, S.J. Summer.
Cesarean section guidelines: the Maryland experience.
JAMA, 263 (1990), pp. 1491
[10.]
G.M. Anderson, J. Lomas.
Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontarui.
C Med J, 141 (1989), pp. 1049-1053
[11.]
H.V. Vuori.
El control de calidad en los servicios sanitarios. Conceptos y metodología.
Masson, (1989),
[12.]
K. McPherson, J.E. Wennberg, O.B. Hovind, P. Clifford.
Small-area variation in the use of common surgical procedures.
N Engl J Med, 307 (1982), pp. 1310-1314
[13.]
A. Sarria, J.M. Sendra.
Diferencias regionales en la utilización de hospitales.
Gac Sanit, 7 (1993), pp. 63-69
[14.]
J.J. Schlesselman.
Case control studies: design, conduct, analysis.
Oxford University Press, (1982),
[15.]
R.S. Stafford.
Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates.
JAMA, 263 (1990), pp. 683-687
[16.]
H.S. Jonas, S.I. Dooley.
The search for lower cesarean section goes on.
JAMA, 263 (1990), pp. 683-687
[17.]
M.H. Malloy, G.G. Rhoads, W. Shramm, G. Land.
Increasing cesarean section rates in very low-birth weight infants.
JAMA, 262 (1989), pp. 1475-1478
[18.]
J. Wennberg, A. Gittelsohn.
Small area variations in health care delivery.
Science, 182 (1973), pp. 1102-1108
[19.]
J. Lomas, M. Enkin, G.M. Anderson, W.J. Hannah, E. Vayda, J. Singer.
Opinions leaders vs audit feedback to implement practice guidelines.
JAMA, 265 (1991), pp. 2202-2207
[20.]
J.E. Wennberg, B.A. Barnes, M. Zubkoff.
Professional uncentainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand.
Soc Sci Med, 16 (1982), pp. 811-823
[21.]
J.P. Neilson.
Cardiotocography during labour.
BMJ, 306 (1993), pp. 347-348
[22.]
S. Greenfields, E.C. Nelson, M. Zubkoff.
Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care.
JAMA, 267 (1992), pp. 1624-1630
[23.]
G. Laffel, D.M. Berwick.
Quality in health care.
JAMA, 268 (1992), pp. 407-409
[24.]
J.E. Wennberg.
Unwanted variations in the rules of practice.
JAMA, 265 (1991), pp. 1306-1307
Copyright © 1994. Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria
Download PDF
Idiomas
Gaceta Sanitaria
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?