Información de la revista
Vol. 10. Núm. 52.
Páginas 34-39 (enero - febrero 1996)
Vol. 10. Núm. 52.
Páginas 34-39 (enero - febrero 1996)
Open Access
Propuesta de incentivos para una medicina general por cuenta ajena
Visitas
3863
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
B. Starfield.
Primary care: concept, evaluation and policy.
[2.]
B. Tomlinson.
Report of the inquiry into London's health service, medical education and research.
[3.]
King's Fund Commission.
London’s Health Care in 2010.
[4.]
G.A. Culley.
«Fried chicken» medicine: the business of primary care.
J Fam Pract, 38 (1994), pp. 68-73
[5.]
J. Gérvas, M.M. Pérez Fernández, B. Starfield.
Primary care, financing and gatekeeping in Western Europe.
Fam Practice, 11 (1994), pp. 307-317
[6.]
J. Gérvas, M.M. Pérez Fernández.
Farmacoeconomía y medicina general.
Farmacoeconomía: evaluación económica de medicamentos, pp. 185-202
[7.]
O. Pané.
Instrumentos para la modernización de la gestión en atención primaria.
Centro Salud, 1 (1993), pp. 754-761
[8.]
A. López Ruiz.
Evaluación de un proyecto de autogestión en atención primaria.
Aten Primaria, 13 (1994), pp. 225-231
[9.]
N. Bosanquet, B. Leese.
Family doctors and economic incentives.
[10.]
K. Shimmura.
Effects of different remuneration methods on general medical practice: a comparison of capitation and fee-for-service payment.
IntJ Health Planning Management, 3 (1988), pp. 245-258
[11.]
C. Donaldson, K. Gerard.
Paying general practicioners: shedding light on the review of health services.
J Royal Coll General Practicioners, 39 (1989), pp. 114-117
[12.]
D.G. Safran, A.R. Tarlov, W.H. Rogers.
Primary care performance in fee-for-service and prepaid health care systems. Results from the Medical Outcome Study.
JAMA, 271 (1994), pp. 1579-1586
[13.]
H. Barnum, J. Kutzin, H. Saxenian.
Incentives and provider payment methods.
Int J Health Planning Management, 10 (1995), pp. 23-45
[14.]
A. Scott, J. Hall.
Evaluating the effects of GP remuneration: problem and prospects.
Health Policy, 31 (1995), pp. 183-195
[15.]
G. Hickson, W. Altemeier, J. Perrin.
Physician reimbursement by salary orfee-for-service: effect on physician practice behavior in a randomized prospective study.
Pediatrics, 80 (1987), pp. 344-350
[16.]
S.C. Stearns, B.L. Wolfe, D.A. Kinding.
Physician responses to fee-for-service and capitation payment.
Inquiry, 29 (1992), pp. 416-425
[17.]
A. Krasnik, P.P. Groenewegen, P.A. Pederson, P. Schölten, G. Moone.
Gottschau A y cols. Changing remuneration systems: effect on activity in general practice.
BMJ, 300 (1990), pp. 1698-1701
[19.]
W. Boerma, F. de Jong, P. Mulder.
Health care and general practice across Europe.
NIVEL, Utrecht, (1993), pp. 7
[20.]
Unidad de Medicina Comunitaria.
Consultas externas intrahospitalarias. Hospital Universitario “12 de octubre”.
Bol Indicadores SISA, 3 (1994), pp. 4-20
[21.]
D.M. Fleming.
Backer P (dirs). The European Study of Referrals from primary to secondary care. Occasional paper 56.
[22.]
A. Vehvilainen, E. Kumpusalo, J. Takala.
Risk of long contact after referring patients to hospitals. SI MG Spring Meeting. Abstracts book.
[23.]
J. Gérvas.
La reforma de la atención primaria. Una propuesta pragmática.
Gac San, 3 (1989), pp. 476-481
[24.]
M. Melguizo, M.A. Prados.
Esquisabel R y cois. Medidas de motivación e incentivación en atención primaria.
[25.]
M. Melguizo.
Grupo de Trabajo de la SEMFC. Incentivos en atención primaria.
Aten Primaria, 14 (1994), pp. 701-703
[26.]
R. Baker.
What is interface audit?.
J Royal Soc Med, 87 (1994), pp. 228-231
[27.]
C.H. Davison, S. Macintyse, G.D. Smith.
The potential social impact of predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to common chronic diseases: a review and proposed research agenda.
Soc Health Illness, 16 (1994), pp. 341-373
[28.]
B. Webb.
The zero option.
BMJ, 310 (1995), pp. 1380
Copyright © 1996. Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria