Información de la revista
Vol. 7. Núm. 39.
Páginas 274-281 (noviembre - diciembre 1993)
Respuestas rápidas
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 7. Núm. 39.
Páginas 274-281 (noviembre - diciembre 1993)
Open Access
Posible Sesgo Anamnésico en un Estudio de Casos y Controles de Displasia Congénita de Cadera
Possible Recall Bias in a Case Control Study on Congenital Dysplasia of the Hip
Visitas
4697
Miguel Delgado Rodríguez1,2,*, C. Jiménez Jiménez3, P. Lardelli Claret3, M. López-Moratalla3, R. Gálvez1,2
1 Cátedra de Medicina Preventiva. Facultad de Medicina. Granada
2 Unidad de Epidemiología Clínica. Hospital Virgen de las Nieves. Granada
3 Departamento de Traumatología y Cirugía. Hospital Clínico. Granada
Este artículo ha recibido

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Resumen
Objetivo

valorar la presenciade un sesgo anamnésico en un estudio de casos y controles sobre displasia congénita de cadera (DCC).

Métodos

se ha realizado un estudio hospitalario de casos y controles. Los casos y controles que presentaran otras malformacioneso hubieran nacido de madres con problemas clínicos durante el embarazo fueron excluidos. Se han recogido 97 casos de DDC y 164 controles. Se valoró el estilo de vida de la madre. Como parámetro de asociación se calcularon razones de ventaja (OR) (crudas y ajustadas por varios factores mediante regresión logística) y sus intervalos de confianza del 95%. Los factores de riesgo se analizaron estratificando por los resultados del signo de Ortolani-Barlow, ya que se entrevistó a las madres después de que éstas conocieran los resultados de la prueba.

Resultados

en las madres de recién nacidos que presentaron un signo positivo de Ortolani-Barlow se observó que la OR para los antecedentes familiares era superior (2,27 versus 1,38). De manera global, en el consumo de alcohol y tabaco, y en el número de controles durante el embarazo se apreció una asociación negativa con la DCC. En estos casos se alcanzaron OR más cercanas al valor nulo en los recién nacidos con una maniobra de Ortolani-Barlow positiva.

Conclusiones

los resultados sugieren la posibilidad de que exista un sesgo anamnésico.

Palabras clave:
Sesgo
Métodos epidemiológicos
Estudio de casos y controles
Defectos congénitos
Summary
Purpose

to ascertain the presence of recall or report bias in a case-control study on congenital dysplasia of the hip (CDH).

Methods

a hospital case-control study was performed. Those cases and controls with other malformations or from mothers with clinical problems were discarded. 97 cases of dysplasia, and 164 ccntrols were collected. Mother’s life style was assessed. Odds ratios (OR) (crude and multiple-factor adjusted by logistic regresión analysis) and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Risk factors were analyzed stratifying by the results of Ortolani-Barlow maneuver, since women were interviewed after knowing these results.

Results

mothers of newborns with a positive Ortolani-Barlow maneuver yielded a higher OR for posit ive family history than those of babies with a negative one (2.27 versus 1.38). Overall smoking and alcohol consumption, and number of health exams during pregnancy yielded a negative association with CDH. In these cases closer-to-the-null ORs were obtained in newborns with positive Ortolani-Barlow.

Conclusions

the presence of a report or recall bias is suggested as one of the possibilities for explaining the results.

Key words:
Bias
Epidemiologic methods
Case-control study
Birth defects
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
J.J. Schlesselman.
Case-control studies. Design, Conduct, Analysis.
Oxford University Press, (1982),
[2.]
D.L. Sackett.
Bias in analytic research.
J Chron Dis, 32 (1979), pp. 51-63
[3.]
S.S. Coughlin.
Recall bias in epidemiologic studies.
J Clin Epidemiol, 43 (1990), pp. 87-91
[4.]
K. Raphael.
Recall bias: a proposal for assessment and control.
Int J Epidemiol, 16 (1987), pp. 167-170
[5.]
S.G. Mackenzie, A. Lippman.
An investigation of report bias in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome.
Am J Epidemiol, 129 (1989), pp. 65-75
[6.]
R. Neugebauer, S. Ng.
Differential recall as a source of bias in epidemiologic research.
J Clin Epidemiol, 43 (1990), pp. 1337-1341
[7.]
W.S. Rholes, J.H. Riskind, J.W. Lane.
Emotional states and memory biases: effects of cognitive priming and mood.
J Pers Soc Psychol, 52 (1987), pp. 91-99
[8.]
H. Ehrlichman, J.N. Halpern.
Affect and memory: effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors on retrieval of happy and unhappy memories.
J Pers Soc Psychol, 55 (1988), pp. 769-779
[9.]
J.L. Kelsey, W.D. Thompson, A.S. Evans.
Methods in Observational Epidemiology.
Oxford University Press, (1986),
[10.]
R. Graf.
Sonography of the infant hip: an atlas.
VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, (1986),
[11.]
R. Graf.
Guide to sonography of the infant hip.
Thieme Medical Publishers, (1987),
[12.]
R. Graf.
New possibilities for the diagnosis of congenital hip joint dislocation by ultrasonography.
J Pediatr Orthop, 3 (1983), pp. 354-359
[13.]
R. Graf.
Fundamentals of sonographic diagnosis of infant hip displasya.
J Pediatr Orthop, 4 (1984), pp. 735-740
[14.]
M. Pauer, K. Rossak, J. Meilchen.
Hüftscreening der neugeborenen Typeneinteilung, therapie und verlaufskontrollen.
Z Orthop, 126 (1988), pp. 629-637
[15.]
Standing Medical Advisory Committee and the Standing Nursing and Midwifery Advisory Committee Working Party.
Screening for the detection of congenital dislocation of the hip.
Arch Dis Child, 61 (1986), pp. 921-926
[16.]
K.J. Rotham.
Modern Epidemiology.
Little, Brown & Co., (1986),
[17.]
W.J. Dixon, M.B. Brown, L. Engelman, J.W. Frane, M.A. Hill, R.I. Jennrich, J.D. Toporek.
BMDP Statistical Software, 1988.
University of California Press, (1988),
[18.]
Y. Feldman, G. Koren, K. Mattice, H. Shear, E. Pellegrini, S.M. MacLeod.
Determinants of recall and recall bias in studying drug and chemical exposure in pregnancy.
Teratology, 40 (1989), pp. 37-45
[19.]
P.M. Dunn.
Congenital postural deformities.
Br Med Bull, 32 (1976), pp. 71-76
[20.]
U. Bick, C. Müller-Leisse, J. Tröger.
Ultrasonography of the hip in preterm neonates.
Pediatr Radiol, 20 (1990), pp. 331-333
[21.]
D.G. Hopwood, T.L. Guidotti.
Recall bias in exposed subjects following a toxic exposure incident.
Arc Environ Health, 43 (1988), pp. 234-237
[22.]
H. Olsson, T.R. Möller, J. Ranstam.
Early oral contraceptive use and breast cancer among premenopausal women: final report from a study in Southern Sweden.
J Natl Cancer Inst, 81 (1989), pp. 1000-1004
[23.]
A.A. Mitchell, L.B. Cottier, S. Shapiro.
Effect of questionaire design on recall of drug exposure in pregnancy.
Am J Epidemiol, 123 (1986), pp. 670-676
[24.]
S.R. Huttly, F.C. Barros, C.G. Victors, J.U. Beria, J.P. Vaughan.
Do mothers overestimate breast feeding duration? An example of recall bias from a study in southern Brazil..
Am J Epidemiol, 132 (1990), pp. 572-575
[25.]
C.D. Drews, J.F. Kraus, S. Greenland.
Recall bias in a case-control study of sudden infant death syndrome.
Int J Epidemiol, 19 (1990), pp. 405-411
[26.]
J. Villar, J. Dorgan, R. Menéndez, L. Bolanos, G. Pareja, E. Kestler.
Perinatal data reliability in a large teaching obstetric unit.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 95 (1988), pp. 841-848
[27.]
H.E. Bryant, N. Visser, E.J. Love.
Records, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy: acomparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women.
Am J Public Health, 79 (1989), pp. 78-80
Copyright © 1993. Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Gaceta Sanitaria
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?