Información de la revista
Vol. 5. Núm. 27.
Páginas 276-283 (noviembre - diciembre 1991)
Vol. 5. Núm. 27.
Páginas 276-283 (noviembre - diciembre 1991)
Open Access
La Relevancia de la Experiencia Norteamericana en la Reforma Del Sistema Nacional de Salud Británico el Caso Del GP Budget Holding
Visitas
3946
Vicente Navarro*
Profesor de Política y Gestión Sanitaria. Profesor de Sociología y de Gestión Económica. Universidad Johns Hopkins. EUA
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliogrífia
[1.]
Working tor Patients.
The Health Service: Caring tor the 1990s.
White Paper, HMSO, (1989),
[2.]
J.P. Weiner, D.M. Ferris.
GP Budget Holding in the UK Lessons from America.
King’s Fund Institute, (1990),
[3.]
R.J. Blendon, R. Leitman, J. Morrison, K. Donelan.
Satisfaction with Health Systems in Ten Nations.
Health Affairs, (1990), pp. 188
[4.]
Blendon, RJ. Three Systems: A Comparative Survey. Health Management Quarterly. First Quarter 1989.
[5.]
D.G. Shimsak, M.C. DeFuria, J.J. DiGiorgio, J. Getson.
An Analysis of HMO Disenrollment Data.
GHAA Journal. Summer, 8 (1987), pp. 13-22
[6.]
E. Jacobs, R. Worcester.
We British: Britain under the Moriscope.
pp. 50
[7.]
Weiner JP, Ferris DM. op.cit., p 19.
[8.]
Ibidem.
[9.]
P.R. Lee, L. Etaeredge.
Clinical Freedom: Two Lessons for the UK from US Experience with Privatisation of Health Care.
Lancet, 4 (1989), pp. 263-265
[10.]
P.C. Coyte, D.N. Dewees, M.J. Trebilcock.
Medical Malpractice.
New Engl J Med, (1991), pp. 89
[11.]
E.G. Gay, J.J. Kronenfeld.
Regulation, Retrenchment—the DRG Experience: Problems from Changing Reimbursement Practice—.
Soc Sic Med, 31 (1990), pp. 1103
[12.]
K.L. Kahn, et al.
The Effects of the DRG—based Prospective Payment System on Quality of Care for Hospitalized Medicare Patients.
JAMA, 264 (1990), pp. 1953-1955
[13.]
Los Angeles Times Poll n,° 212: Health Care in the United States. Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, Storrs, Conn., March 1990.
[14.]
Woolhandle S, Himmelstein DU. To Save a Penny Two are Spent: The Deteriorating Administrative Efficiency of US Health Care. Center for Health Policy, Harvard University (manuscript)
[15.]
S.J. Palsbo, M.R. Gold.
HMO Industry Profile. Vol. 3. Financial Performance, 1988.
Group Health Association of America, (1990),
[16.]
U. Reinhardt.
The Medical B Factor: Bureaucracy in Action.
Washington Post, (1988),
[17.]
D. Himmelstein, S. Woolhandler.
Cost without Benefit: Administrative Waste in US Medicine.
New Eng J Med, 314 (1986), pp. 441-445
[18.]
Los Angeles Times. Poll, op. cit.
[19.]
K.R. Leist, M.S. Freeland, D.R. Waldo.
Health Spending and Ability to Pay: Busmes Individuals, and Government.
Healt Care Financing Review, 3 (1989), pp. 10-12
[20.]
Weiner JP, Ferris D. op. Cit.
[21.]
For utilization after abolition of out-of-pocket payment in Quebec, see McDonald, et al. New England Journal of Medicine 1974; 291: 694–652; for impact of copayments In Saskatchewan, see Horne, et al Medical Care 1980; 18: 787; for the US. see Brook R et al. New England Journal ol Medicine 1983; 309: 1426–1434: y Sin Z, et al. New England Journal of Medicine 1986; 315: 1259–1266
[22.]
Jacobs E, Worcester R. op. cit.
[23.]
Blendon RJ, Leitman R, Morrison J, Donelan K. op. cit.
Copyright © 1991. Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria