Información del artículo
Resumen
En este artículo se analizan los principales problemas que plantea la investigacion de un conglomerado de casos de cáncer, especialmente en referencia a percepción y comunicación de los riesgos a la población. Se revisan las necesidades de información de la población y la manera de proporcionar la información relacionada con la exposición a riesgo ambientales, así como la relación con los medios de comunicación. Finalmente, se discuten las implicaciones que para la investigación epidemiológica y para la salud pública tiene la percepción del riesgo.
Palabras clave:
Cáncer
Conglomerado
Percepción del riesgo
Comunicación
Summary
This paper analyzes the main problems in the research on cancer clusters, with a specific emphasis on the population perception and risk communication. Population information needs and the approach to give information to the population regardind environmental risks are reviewed, as well as the relationship with mass media. Finally, the implications of risk perception for epidemiologic research on clusters and for public health are discussed.
Key words:
Cancer
Cluster
Risk perception
Communication
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
Terracini B. Small area epidemiology: methods for the study of enviromental and occupational hazards. Medicina del Lavoro 1996 (en prensa).
[2.]
C.A. González, J.M. Borràs, P. Luna, C. Baixeras, E. Mariano, G. Pera.
Childhood leukemia in a residential small town near Barcelona.
Arch Env Health, 52 (1996), pp. 322-325
[3.]
Alexander FE, Boyle P. Statistical methods of investigating localised cluster of disease. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (in press).
[4.]
S.F. Olsen, M. Martuzzi, P. Elliott.
Cluster analysis and disease mapping: Why, when and how? A step by step guide.
BMJ, 313 (1996), pp. 863-866
[5.]
B. Fischhoff, S.R. Watson, C. Hope.
Defining risk.
Policy Sciences, 17 (1984), pp. 123-139
[6.]
C.A.J. Vlek.
Decision making about risk acceptance.
Health Council, (1990),
[7.]
Centers for Disease Control.
Guidelines for investigating cluster of health events.
MMWR, 39 (1990), pp. 1-23
[8.]
A.P. Bender, A.N. Williams, R.A. Johnson, H.G. Jagger.
Appropiate public health responses to cluster: the art of being responsibly responsive.
Am J Epidemiol, 132 (1990), pp. S48-S52
[9.]
B. MacMahon.
Is acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children virus-related?.
Am J Epidemiol, 136 (1992), pp. 916-923
[10.]
A. Izquierdo, P. Viladiu, J.M. Borràs, V. Moreno, G. Catalán.
La percepción de las causas del cáncer y de su prevención en las mujeres de Girona.
Med Clin, 107 (1996), pp. 14-19
[11.]
J. Sunyer.
Característiques i funcions de l'epidemiologia ambiental.
Gac Sanit, 4 (1990), pp. 145-156
[12.]
National Research Council.
Improving risk communication.
National Academy Press, (1989),
[13.]
V.T. Covello, D. MacCallum, M. Pavlova.
Effective risk communication: the role and responsibility of governmental and non-governmental organizations.
Plenum, (1989),
[15.]
V.T. Covello.
Risk perception and communication.
Canadian Public Health J, 86 (1995), pp. 78-80
[16.]
W.K. Hallman, A. Wandersman.
Attribution of responsability and individual and collective coping with environmental threats.
J Soc Issues, 48 (1992), pp. 101-118
[17.]
B.J. Hence, C. Chess, P.M. Sandman.
Improving dialogue with communities: a risk communication manual for government.
New Jersey Department of Enviromental Protection and Energy, (1991),
[18.]
P. Strong.
Epidemic psychology: a model.
Soc Health Illness, 12 (1990), pp. 249-259
[19.]
D. Nelkin, S. Gilman.
Placing blame for devastating disease.
Soc Res, 55 (1988), pp. 361-378
[20.]
H. Vyner.
The psychological dimensions of health care for patients exposed to radiation and the other invisible enviromental contaminants.
Soc Sci Med, 27 (1988), pp. 1097-1103
[21.]
P. Phillmore, S. Moffatt.
Discounted knowledge: local experience, environement, pollution and health.
Researching people's health, pp. 134-156
[22.]
P. Slovic.
Perceived risk, trust and democracy.
Risk Anal, 13 (1993), pp. 675-682
[23.]
P.M. Sandman.
Emerging responsabilities of epidemiologists.
J Clin Epidemiol, 44 (1991), pp. 41S-50S
[24.]
Enviromental Health Policy Committee.
Recommendations to improve health risk communication.
US Department of Health and Human Services, (1994),
[25.]
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
A primer on health risk communication principles and practices.
US Department of Health and Human Services, (1994),
[26.]
S. Jasanoff.
Acceptable evidence in a pluralistic society.
Acceptable evidence, pp. 29-47
[27.]
Dutch Health Council.
Risk is more than just numbers.
Health Council, (1996),
[28.]
J.M. Borràs, A. Izquierdo, P. Viladiu, V. Moreno, G. Catalán.
Las fuentes de información sobre el cáncer.
Aten Prim, 16 (1995), pp. 480-484
[29.]
T.L. Guidotti, P.H. Jacobs.
The implications of an epidemiological mistake: a community's response to a perceived excess cancer risk.
Am J Public Health, 83 (1993), pp. 233-239
[31.]
F. Hoan, M.A. Bober, E.M. Huerta, S.D. Hursting, S. Lemon, D.L. Weed.
The association between alcohol and breast cancer: popular press coverage of research.
Am J Public Health, 85 (1995), pp. 1082-1086
[32.]
D. Nelkin.
Communicating technological risk.
Annu Rev Public Health, 10 (1989), pp. 95-113
[33.]
M. Greenberg, D. Wartenberg.
How epidemiologists can improve television networks news coverage of disease cluster reports.
Epidemiology, 1 (1991), pp. 167-170
[34.]
M. Greenberg, D. Wartenberg.
Understanding mass media coverage of disease cluster.
Am J Epidemiol, 132 (1990), pp. S192-S195
[36.]
D. Nelkin.
La ciencia en el escaparate.
FUNDESCO, (1989),
[37.]
P. Singer.
Reporting on risk.
Russell-Sage Foundation, (1993),
[38.]
R.L. Keeny.
Understanding life-threatening risks.
Risk Anal, 15 (1995), pp. 627-637
[39.]
W.S. Burns, P. Slovic, R. Kasperson, J.X. Kasperson, O. Renn, S. Emani.
Incorporating structural models into research on the social amplification of risk: implications for theory construction and decision making.
Risk Anal, 13 (1993), pp. 611-623
[40.]
D.A. Redelmeier, P. Rozin, D. Kahneman.
Understanding patients decisions: cognitive and emotional perspectives.
JAMA, 270 (1993), pp. 72-76
[41.]
J. Higginson, F. Chu.
Ethical considerations and responsabilities in communicating health risk information.
J Clin Epidemiol, 44 (1991), pp. 51S-56S
[42.]
O. Renn.
The social arena concept of risk debates.
Social theories of risk, pp. 179-196
[43.]
S. Klaidman.
How well the media report health risk.
Risk, pp. 119-132
[44.]
A. Irwin.
Citizen Science.
Routledge, (1994),
[45.]
H. Otway, D. von Winterfeldt.
Expert judgement in risk analysis and management: process, context and pitfalls.
Risk Anal, 12 (1992), pp. 83-93
[46.]
R. Kasperson.
Six propositions on public participation and their relevance for risk communication.
Risk Anal, 6 (1986), pp. 275-281
[47.]
K. Shrader-Frechette.
Reductionist approaches to risk.
Acceptable evidence, pp. 218-247
[48.]
D.B. McCallum, S.L. Hammond, V.T. Covello.
Communicating about enviromental risks: how the public uses and perceives information sources.
Health Educ Q, 18 (1991), pp. 349-361
[49.]
P. Novotny.
Popular epidemiology and the struggle for community health: alternative perspectives from the enviromental justice movement.
Capital Nature Socialism, 5 (1994), pp. 29-42
[50.]
P. Brown.
Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: lay and professional ways of knowing.
J Health Soc Behaviour, 33 (1992), pp. 267-281
[51.]
J. Popay, G. Williams.
Researching the people's health.
Routledge, (1996),
[52.]
Report of an Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation.
Electromagnetic fields and the risk of cancer.
National Radiological Protection Board, 3 (1992), pp. 1-138
[53.]
E.P. Washburn, M.J. Orza, J.A. Berlin, W.J. Nicholson, A.C. Todd, H. Frumkin, T.C. Chalmer.
Residential proximity to electricity transmission and distribution equipment and risk of chilhood leukemia, childhood lymphoma and childhood nervous system tumors: systematic review, evaluation and meta-analyisis.
Cancer Causes and Control, 5 (1994), pp. 299-309
[54.]
E.J. Burgers.
Health as a surrogate for the environment.
Risk, pp. 133-154
Copyright © 1998. Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria
