Journal Information
Vol. 27. Issue 2.
Pages 123-127 (March - April 2013)
Visits
Not available
Vol. 27. Issue 2.
Pages 123-127 (March - April 2013)
Original
Open Access
Factors associated with edentulousness in an elderly population in Valencia (Spain)
Factores asociados con el edentulismo en población anciana de Valencia (España)
Visits
1815
María Vicenta Eustaquio-Raga
Corresponding author
m.vicenta.eustaquio@uv.es

Corresponding author.
, José María Montiel-Company, José Manuel Almerich-Silla
Stomatology Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (4)
Table 1. The distribution of the variables in the study group (n=531).
Table 2. Factors associated with edentulism in a population aged 65-74 years old.
Table 3. Number of teeth present in a population aged 65-74 years old (n=531), by variable.
Table 4. Multiple logistic regression model with edentulism as the dependent variable in a population aged 65-74 years old (area under curve=0.74; R2 Nagelkerke=0.178; n=531).
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Objective

To determine the prevalence of edentulism and its association with various socioeconomic factors and oral health habits in the population aged 65-74 years old in the region of Valencia.

Methods

A cross sectional study was designed. Thirty-four primary health centers and five nursing homes were chosen at random in the region of Valencia (10-15 voluntary participants per sampling point). Clinical examinations were carried out by three calibrated dentists (kappa>0.85) in the same centers. The total sample consisted of 531 individuals (235 men and 296 women).

Results

The percentage of toothlessness was 20.7% and the mean number of natural teeth present was 14.92. The prevalence of edentulism was significantly higher (p <0.05) in men, institutionalized persons, those with no schooling, those with poor oral hygiene, those who visited the dentist regularly and those living in peri-urban/rural areas. In a multivariate logistic regression model with edentulism as the dependent variable, the following factors were identified as significant independent variables: institutionalization (odds ratio [OR]=2.88), poor oral hygiene (OR=2.35), regular visits to the dentist (OR=2.34) and age (OR=1.19).

Conclusion

Edentulousness is a complex phenomenon that involves distinct social and economic factors.

Keywords:
Epidemiology
Dental health surveys
Elderly
Tooth loss
Resumen
Objetivo

Determinar la prevalencia del edentulismo y su asociación con diferentes factores socioeconómicos y de hábitos de salud oral en la población valenciana de 65 a 74 años de edad.

Métodos

Se diseñó un estudio transversal. Se seleccionaron aleatoriamente 34 centros de salud de atención primaria y cinco residencias geriátricas de la Comunidad Valenciana (10 a 15 individuos voluntarios por punto de muestreo). Las exploraciones clínicas las realizaron tres odontólogos previamente calibrados (kappa>0.85) en los mismos centros. La muestra total fue de 531 personas, 235 hombres y 296 mujeres.

Resultados

El porcentaje de desdentados totales fue de 20,7, y la media de dientes naturales presente de 14,92. La prevalencia de edentulismo fue significativamente mayor (p <0.05) en los hombres, en las personas institucionalizadas, que no tienen estudios, con pobre higiene oral, que visitan regularmente al odontólogo y en las que viven en zonas periurbanas o rurales. En un modelo de regresión logística multivariada con el edentulismo como variable dependiente se han hallado como variables significativas la institucionalización (odds ratio [OR]=2,88), la pobre higiene oral (OR=2,35), las visitas regulares al odontólogo (OR=2,34) y la edad (OR=1,19).

Conclusión

El edentulismo es un fenómeno complejo, con diversos factores sociales y económicos implicados.

Palabras clave:
Epidemiología
Encuestas de salud bucal
Ancianos
Pérdida de dientes
Full Text
Introduction

Aging of the world population is leading to a major readjustment in social and health services in most of the developed world. In Spain, and specifically in the Spanish region of Valencia, the demographic aging of recent decades is graphically demonstrated by population pyramids, where the over-65-year-olds already represent more than 16% of the total.

In the autonomous region of Valencia, as in the rest of Spain, dental care has traditionally been almost entirely private. For decades, the public health service confined itself exclusively to diagnosis and pain-relief: medicines and extraction. Any other treatment had to be arranged with a private practice and paid for by the patient. It was not until the 1980s that the public health system began to include dentistry to a certain extent, focusing above all on the child population. For this reason, there is a great lack of official programs to promote oral hygiene and dietary habits among the older adult population, which is therefore at greater risk of tooth loss.

Total tooth loss is the variable most often used to gauge the oral health of the elderly. As a result, it is possible to compare how the prevalence of toothlessness has evolved in many countries through the publication of epidemiological data over the years. Although not highly explicit, this variable nonetheless expresses oral status during the final stage of a lifetime.

Analyzing the causes that lead individuals to lose all their teeth is a complex, multifactorial task involving many objective data (caries, periodontal disease, traumas, iatrogenic effects), as well as factors that are subjective but no less important (ethnic and cultural factors, sociocultural level, diagnoses, uncertainty in therapeutic assessments).1

What is certain is that toothless people have lost an important bodily function, with major repercussions for their general health and their relationship with their environment that can affect their quality of life and cause psychosocial and even emotional problems.2,3

A person with total tooth loss is one whose masticatory function is deficient or non-existent, entailing serious nutritional problems.4

Various factors are related to tooth loss. All information that leads to a better understanding of the factors associated with edentulism is important to enable the authorities and oral health professionals to plan and provide appropriate dental services for the elderly.

The objective of this study was to determine the percentage of edentulism in the older adult population of the region of Valencia in Spain and to assess its association with the distinct variables involved, such as age, sex, educational level, institutionalization, place of residence, regular visits to the dentist, smoking and alcohol consumption.

MethodsSample design, size and selection

A cross sectional study was designed to be representative of the 65-74-year-old population of the region of Valencia. The sample size was calculated, taking into account the prevalence of edentulism in Spain, for a level of precision of 0.035. The sample was obtained from primary healthcare centers and nursing homes.

The 121 primary care centers of the health system of Valencia are located throughout the region. Of these 121 primary care centers, 34 were chosen at random. An institutionalized sample representing 12% of the total sample (a similar percentage to that of institutionalized patients aged over 65 years in the Valencia region) was randomly selected from five institutions (three public and two private).

Between 10 and 15 individuals aged between 65 and 74 years were examined per sampling point. In primary care centers, individuals who were attending for reasons other than oral/dental disease were included. Individuals in these centers were invited to participate in the study voluntarily and with no reward except for a dental examination. In nursing homes, participants were selected at random from the total number of residents recorded in each residence. All individuals were volunteers. The refusal rate was low (<15%). The examinations were carried out in November and December 2006 in the same sampling points.

Materials and human resources

The form employed to record the information from the questionnaire and the oral examination of each participant was custom-designed, based on the assessment form model recommended by the World Health Organization,5 adapted to the variables analyzed. The questionnaire was administered by the examiner while performing the dental examination.

Three dentistry graduates were selected to conduct the field work after calibrating them against a standard examiner, following the World Health Organization's guidelines. The kappa index of inter-examiner agreement was above 0.85.

Study variables

The relationship between edentulism and the mean number of teeth present and a number of socio-economic variables and dichotomized oral health habits was studied:

  • Educational level: three categories were established. The maximum level of education attained was classified into ‘no schooling’ (illiterate), ‘primary’ (basic schooling) and ‘higher’ for those with vocational training qualifications, the baccalaureate or a university diploma or degree.

  • Institutionalization: those who lived in a nursing home were considered ‘institutionalized’.

  • Residence: urban residents (those living in settlements with more than 50,000 inhabitants) were distinguished from rural (peri-urban and rural) residents (those living in settlements with fewer than 50,000 inhabitants).

  • Gender: male or female.

  • Smoking: classified as ‘yes’ when the patient currently smoked or had given up smoking less than 2 years before.

  • Alcohol consumption: classified as ‘yes’ when the patient consumed at least one alcoholic drink every day.

  • Visits to the dentist: classified as ‘yes’ when the patient had visited the dentist at least once a year for the past 5 years.

  • Tooth brushing and hygiene of dental prostheses: ‘poor oral hygiene’ was recorded for those who responded that they never or almost never brushed their teeth, and ‘poor prosthesis hygiene’ for denture wearers who never or almost never cleaned their dental prostheses.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of the University of Valencia, Spain, and was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki. All the participants signed an informed consent form.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed with a statistics program (SPSS 15.0®). In the univariate analysis, Student's t-test was used to compare the means of the number of teeth present (including edentulous people) and a chi square test was used to compare the percentages of edentulism. In the multivariate analysis, a logistic regression was also performed with edentulism as the dependent variable and the study variables as the independent variables, using the forward stepwise (Wald) method and the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for the adjustment of the model.

Results

A total of 531 persons aged 65-74 years old were examined, of whom 235 were men and 296 were women. The mean age of the sample was 70.1 years (confidence interval of 95% [95%CI]: 69.8-70.4): 70.3 years for men (95%CI: 68.9-70.7) and 70.0 for women (95%CI: 69.6-70.4). The percentage distribution of the variables is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

The distribution of the variables in the study group (n=531).

  % (95%CI) 
Educational level
No schooling  90  16.9% (13.9-20.4) 
Primary  332  62.5% (58.3-66.5) 
Higher  109  20.5% (17.3-24.1) 
Institutionalization
Yes  63  11.8% (9.3-14.9) 
No  468  88.1% (85.1-90.6) 
Residence
Rural/p-u  44  27.1% (23.5-31.1) 
Urban  387  72.9% (68.9-76.4) 
Gender
Male  235  44.3% (40.1-48.5) 
Female  296  55.7% (51.5-59.9) 
Smoking
Yes  76  14.3% (11.6-17.5) 
No  455  85.7% (82.5-88.4) 
Alcohol consumption
Yes  113  21.3% (18.0-24.9) 
No  418  78.7% (75.0-81.9) 
Poor oral or prosthesis hygiene
Yes  131  24.7% (21.2-28.5) 
No  400  75.3% (71.5-78.8) 
Regular visits to the dentist
Yes  428  80.6% (77.0-83.7) 
No  103  19.4% (16.3-22.9) 

95%CI: confidence interval of 95%.

The prevalence of edentate persons was 20.7% with a 95%CI of 17.3% to 24.4%. The mean age of the edentulous group was 69.7 years (95%CI: 69.3-70.1) and that of the non-edentulous group was 71.6 years (95%CI: 71.1-72.2).

In the univariate analysis, the following variables were significantly associated with edentulism (p <0.05 in the chi square test): no schooling, institutionalization, rural residence, male gender, poor oral hygiene and regular visits to the dentist (Table 2). The mean number of teeth present was 14.92 (95%CI: 14.06-15.78). The number of teeth present was significantly lower (p <0.05 Student's t-test) in participants who had no schooling, were institutionalized, resided in a peri-urban/rural area, were male, had poor oral hygiene and made regular visits to the dentist (Table 3).

Table 2.

Factors associated with edentulism in a population aged 65-74 years old.

  Prevalence of edentulism (95%CI)  Prevalence odds ratio (95%CI) 
Educational levela
No Schooling  31.1% (21.7-40.6)  Reference 1 
Primary  19.9% (15.9-24.5)  0.55 (0.33-0.93) 
Higher  14.7% (9.2-22.5)  0.38 (0.19-0.76) 
Institutionalizationa
Yes  42.9% (30.4-55.9)  3.47 (2.01-6.04) 
No  17.7% (14.3-21.2)   
Residencea
Rural/peri-urban  27.8% (20.6-35.8)  1.74 (1.11-2.72) 
Urban  18.1% (14.3-22.3)   
Gendera
Male  24.7% (19.3-30.7)  1.53 (1.01-2.34) 
Female  17.6% (13.4-22.4)   
Smoking
Yes  25.0% (15.7-36.2)  1.33 (0.75-2.35) 
No  20.0% (16.4-23.9)   
Alcohol consumption
Yes  16.8% (8.3-21.9)  0.59 (0.33-1.05) 
No  21.8% (17.9-26.1)   
Poor oral or prosthesis hygienea
Yes  33.6% (25.5-42.3)  2.60 (1.66-4.08) 
No  16.5% (12.7-20.2)   
Regular visits to the dentista
Yes  23.6% (19.6-27.9)  3.22 (1.57-6.62) 
No  8.7% (4.1-15.9)   

95%CI: confidence interval of 95%.

a

Significant association (p <0.05) using the chi square test.

Table 3.

Number of teeth present in a population aged 65-74 years old (n=531), by variable.

  Mean teeth present  (95%CI) 
Educational levela
No schooling  12.67  (10.40-14.93) 
Primary  14.83  (13.75-15.91) 
Higher  17.96  (15.26-18.87) 
Institutionalizationa
Yes  7.70  (5.53-9.86) 
No  15.90  (15.00-16.79) 
Residencea
Rural/peri-urban  11.88  (10.25-13.50) 
Urban  16.06  (15.06-17.05) 
Gendera
Male  13.38  (12.09-14.68) 
Female  16.15  (15.01-17.29) 
Smoking
Yes  13.70  (11.32-16.07) 
No  15.13  (14.20-16.05) 
Alcohol consumption
Yes  16.19  (14.37-18.02) 
No  14.58  (13.60-15.56) 
Poor oral or prosthesis hygienea
Yes  11.13  (9.35-12.91) 
No  16.17  (15.21-17.12) 
Regular visits to the dentista
Yes  13.93  (12.96-14.89) 
No  19.06  (17.35-20.77) 

95%CI: confidence interval of 95%.

a

Significant differences (p <0.05) in mean teeth present using Student's t-test or Anova test.

In the multivariate logistic regression model with edentulism as the dependent variable (Hosmer and Lemeshow's goodness-of-fit test, p=0.283), the variables significantly and independently associated with edentulism were institutionalization, poor oral hygiene, regular visits to the dentist and age (Table 4). The ROC curve, with an area under the curve of 0.74, is shown in figure 1.

Table 4.

Multiple logistic regression model with edentulism as the dependent variable in a population aged 65-74 years old (area under curve=0.74; R2 Nagelkerke=0.178; n=531).

Independent variables  Prevalence OR  (95%CI)  Wald p-value 
Age  1.19  (1.10-1.27)  0.00 
Institutionalization  2.88  (1.60-5.17)  0.00 
Poor oral or prosthesis hygiene  2.35  (1.46-3.78)  0.03 
Regular visits to the dentist  2.34  (1.10-4.94)  0.02 

OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: confidence interval of 95%.

Figure 1.

ROC curve of the model.

(0.09MB).
Discussion

One of the main biases of a cross sectional study is selection bias in the sample. In this study, given the health centers sampled and that the percentage of individuals aged 65-74 regularly using public healthcare is 90%, according to health survey of the Valencian region in 2005, we believe that the sample was representative of the population.

This study found that 20.7% of individuals in the 65-75-year-old age group were edentate, which is within the range found in the last two oral health surveys of the Spanish population (between 16.8% and 23.4%). The goal for the year 20206 is a prevalence of under 15%.

A number of studies have documented reductions in edentulism in different European countries (at least in those for which data are available), with considerable differences in the percentage of edentate individuals being reported in each.7,8

Comparison between the present results and those of studies from other countries must be approached with caution, as many were conducted in cohorts covering greater age ranges, such as the population aged 60 or over.9,10 When comparison is limited to the 65-74-year-old age group, the prevalence of edentulism in this study is higher than in countries such as China (11%) but is far lower than in others such as the United Kingdom (46%).

Turning to other European countries, in Sweden the percentage of toothless persons recorded in a sample of men and women11 was slightly higher than that in the present study. In Lithuania, a prevalence survey carried out at the end of the 1990s in persons aged 65 to 74 years old showed that only 15% were toothless.12 In France, in 1995, 16.3% of the 65-74 year-old population were edentulate.13

The present study corroborates the results of previous research in which the greater the age of the study population, the greater the proportion of persons with total tooth loss.14,15 This is understandable, since oral diseases, particularly dental caries, have a natural cumulative tendency.

In agreement with previously-published studies,16,17 the prevalence of edentulism was higher in peri-urban/rural areas (27.8%) than in urban areas (18.1%).

In the present study, the factor that showed the greatest association with tooth loss was institutionalization. A number of previous studies have found that elderly persons who lived in an institution generally had worse oral health and a higher percentage of edentulism.18,19

The present study confirms that as the level of education rises, the level of toothlessness falls.20–22 The higher the level of education, the greater the chances of receiving general health education, which also influences the adoption of healthier lifestyle habits.

According to the Adult Dental Health Survey carried out in the United Kingdom in 1998, the factors with the greatest influence on toothlessness were age followed by educational level.23 Consequently, although general falling, edentulism would appear to be concentrated in particular risk groups.20

Lawton et al24 also showed a strong association between edentulism and cultural factors linked with particular ethnic groups.

Ascertaining oral health habits (visits to the dentist, oral hygiene, smoking and alcohol consumption) through questionnaires can yield highly slanted results because, out of courtesy, interviewees tend to give answers that are closer to what is considered socially acceptable than the real situation. Additionally, the methods and samples employed by the various studies on this subject are not always comparable (different sample sizes, questions asked or target population age range).

Regular dental visits have been associated with a reduced risk of tooth loss.25 In the present study, however, the mean number of teeth present was lower in patients who visited the dentist regularly. This finding could be because the dental services were being used for extractions or prosthetic treatment rather than preventive care by this group of older people.

The literature describes habitual smoking as being strongly associated with total tooth loss.26–28 Some studies have calculated that habitual smokers have a 20% greater risk of tooth loss than persons who have never smoked.29 In this study, smoking was not a significant factor in edentulism, even though non-smokers had a greater mean number of teeth present than smokers.

In agreement with the present study, other studies have found that habitual drinking did not show a significant association with total tooth loss.27

All the variables described above confirm the association of social and economic factors with edentulism in the adult population of the Valencia region aged between 65 and 74 years. To reduce edentulism, measures to improve oral hygiene habits will need to be accompanied by social and cultural measures.

What is known on the topic?

Because of greater life expectancy, maintaining optimal oral health is increasingly important. Study of the prevalence and severity of tooth loss provides useful information for decision-making on prevention.

What does this study add to the literature?

This study demonstrates the association between social and economic factors and edentulism and tooth loss in the elderly population. To reduce the prevalence of toothlessness, a multidisciplinary approach is required.

Authors’ contributions

J.M. Almerich-Silla and J.M. Montiel-Company designed the study. M.V. Eustaquio-Raga and J.M. Montiel-Company performed the data analysis and interpretation. All the authors were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content and have approved the version to be published.

Funding

This study was funded by the Directorate General for Public Health of the Health Ministry of the Valencian Regional Government. Principal researcher: Dr. José Manuel Almerich-Silla. (20060970).

Conflict of interests

None.

References
[1]
R. Ettinger, C. Watkings, H. Cowen.
Reflections on changes in geriatric dentistry.
J Dent Educ, 64 (2000), pp. 715-722
[2]
D. Locker.
The burden of oral disorders in a population of older adults.
Community Dent Health, 9 (1992), pp. 109-124
[3]
I. Morita, H. Nakagaki, K. Kato, et al.
Relationship between number of natural teeth in older Japanese people and health related functioning.
J Oral Rehabil, 34 (2007), pp. 428-432
[4]
Spanish Geriatric Oral Health Research Group. Oral health issues of Spanish adults aged 65 and over. Int Dent J. 2001; 51:228-34.
[5]
World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 4th ed. Geneve: WHO; 1997. 66 p.
[6]
M. Bravo, J. Cortés, E. Casals, et al.
Basic oral health goals for Spain 2015-2020.
Int Dent J, 59 (2009), pp. 78-82
[7]
D. Bourgeois, A. Nihtila, A. Mersel.
Prevalence of caries and edentulousness among 65 to 74-year-olds in Europe.
Bull World Health Organ, 76 (1998), pp. 413-417
[8]
F. Müller, M. Naharro, G.E. Carlsson.
What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe.
Clin Oral Implants Res, 3 (2007), pp. 2-14
[9]
C. Adams, L.M. Slack-Smith, A. Larson, et al.
Edentulism and associated factors in people 60 years and over from rural and remote Western Australia.
Aust Dent J, 48 (2003), pp. 10-14
[10]
L. Ekanayake, I. Perera.
The association between clinical oral health status and oral impacts experienced by older individuals in Sri Lanka.
J Oral Rehabil, 31 (2004), pp. 467-476
[11]
S. Fure, I. Zickert.
Incidence of tooth loss and dental caries in 60-, 70- and 80-year-old Swedish individuals.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 25 (1997), pp. 137-142
[12]
J. Aleksejuniene, D. Holst, H.M. Eriksen.
Patterns of dental caries and treatment experience in elderly Lithuanians.
Gerodontology, 17 (2000), pp. 77-86
[13]
D. Bourgeois, P. Berger, P. Hescot, et al.
Oral health status in 65-74 years old adults in France, 1995.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique, 47 (1999), pp. 55-59
[14]
F.N. Hugo, J.B. Hilgert, M.R. de Sousa, et al.
Correlates of partial tooth loss and edentulism in the Brazilian elderly.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 35 (2007), pp. 224-232
[15]
E. Musacchio, E. Perissinotto, P. Binotto, et al.
Tooth loss in the elderly and its association with nutritional status, socio-economic and lifestyle factors.
Acta Odontol Scand, 65 (2007), pp. 78-86
[16]
B. Haikola, K. Oikarinen, A-L. Söderholm, et al.
Prevalence of edentulousness and related factors among elderly finns.
J Oral Rehabil, 35 (2008), pp. 827-835
[17]
C.E. Medina-Solís, R. Pérez-Núñez, G. Maupomé, et al.
National survey on edentulism and its geographic distribution, among Mexicans 18 years of age and older (with emphasis in WHO age groups).
J Oral Rehabil, 35 (2008), pp. 237-244
[18]
J.M. Starr, R.J. Hall, S. Macintyre, et al.
Predictors and correlates of edentulism in the healthy old people in Edinburgh (HOPE) study.
Gerodontology, 25 (2008), pp. 199-204
[19]
R.M. Carneiro, D.D. da Silva, L. de Sousa M da, et al.
Oral health of institutionalized elderly in the eastern zone of São Paulo, Brazil, 1999.
Cad Saude Publica, 21 (2005), pp. 1709-1716
[20]
J.M. Brodeur, M. Benigeri, H. Naccache, et al.
Trends in the level of edentulism in Quebec between 1980 and 1993.
J Can Dent Assoc, 62 (1996), pp. 159-166
[21]
R. Watt, A. Sheiham.
Inequalities in oral health: a review of the evidence and recommendations for action.
Br Dent J, 187 (1998), pp. 6-12
[22]
R. Nalçaci, E.O. Erdemir, I. Baran.
Evaluation of the oral health status of the people aged 65 years and over living in near rural district of Middle Anatolia, Turkey.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 45 (2007), pp. 55-64
[23]
E. Treasure, M. Kelly, N. Nuttall, et al.
Factors associated with oral health: a multivariate analysis of results from the 1998 Adult Dental Health survey.
Br Dent J, 190 (2001), pp. 60-68
[24]
B. Lawton, S. Rose, J. Kieser, et al.
Disparities in edentulism and tooth loss between Māori and non-Māori New Zealand women.
Aust N Z J Public Health, 32 (2008), pp. 254-260
[25]
J. Cunha-Cruz, P.P. Hujoel, P. Nadanovsky.
Secular trends in socio-economic disparities in edentulism: USA, 1972-2001.
J Dent Res, 86 (2007), pp. 131-136
[26]
T. Hanioka, M. Ojima, K. Tanaka, et al.
Association of total tooth loss with smoking, drinking alcohol and nutrition in elderly Japanese: analysis of national database.
Gerodontology, 24 (2007), pp. 87-92
[27]
Q. Xie, A. Ainamo.
Association of edentulousness with systemic factors in elderly people living at home.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 27 (1999), pp. 202-209
[28]
J.M. Albandar, C.F. Streckfus, M.R. Adesanya, et al.
Cigar, pipe, and cigarette smoking as risk factors for periodontal disease and tooth loss.
J Periodontol, 71 (2000), pp. 1874-1881
[29]
T. Dietrich, N.N. Maserejian, K.J. Joshipura, et al.
Tobacco use and incidence of tooth loss among US male health professionals.
J Dent Res, 86 (2007), pp. 373-377
Copyright © 2011. SESPAS
Download PDF
Idiomas
Gaceta Sanitaria
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?