array:24 [
  "pii" => "S0213911102716695"
  "issn" => "02139111"
  "doi" => "10.1016/S0213-9111(02)71669-5"
  "estado" => "S300"
  "fechaPublicacion" => "2002-05-01"
  "aid" => "71669"
  "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria"
  "copyrightAnyo" => "2002"
  "documento" => "article"
  "crossmark" => 0
  "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"
  "subdocumento" => "sco"
  "cita" => "Gac Sanit. 2002;16:244-9"
  "abierto" => array:3 [
    "ES" => true
    "ES2" => true
    "LATM" => true
  ]
  "gratuito" => true
  "lecturas" => array:2 [
    "total" => 2406
    "formatos" => array:3 [
      "EPUB" => 113
      "HTML" => 1796
      "PDF" => 497
    ]
  ]
  "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [
    "pii" => "S0213911102716701"
    "issn" => "02139111"
    "doi" => "10.1016/S0213-9111(02)71670-1"
    "estado" => "S300"
    "fechaPublicacion" => "2002-05-01"
    "aid" => "71670"
    "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria"
    "documento" => "article"
    "crossmark" => 0
    "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"
    "subdocumento" => "sco"
    "cita" => "Gac Sanit. 2002;16:250-6"
    "abierto" => array:3 [
      "ES" => true
      "ES2" => true
      "LATM" => true
    ]
    "gratuito" => true
    "lecturas" => array:2 [
      "total" => 3816
      "formatos" => array:3 [
        "EPUB" => 143
        "HTML" => 3137
        "PDF" => 536
      ]
    ]
    "es" => array:10 [
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
      "titulo" => "Perspectivas en disrupción endocrina"
      "tienePdf" => "es"
      "tieneTextoCompleto" => 0
      "tieneResumen" => array:2 [
        0 => "es"
        1 => "en"
      ]
      "paginas" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "paginaInicial" => "250"
          "paginaFinal" => "256"
        ]
      ]
      "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
        "en" => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "Perspectives in endocrine disruption"
        ]
      ]
      "contieneResumen" => array:2 [
        "es" => true
        "en" => true
      ]
      "contienePdf" => array:1 [
        "es" => true
      ]
      "autores" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "N. Olea, M.F. Fernández, P. Araque, F. Olea-Serrano"
          "autores" => array:4 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "N."
              "apellidos" => "Olea"
            ]
            1 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "M.F."
              "apellidos" => "Fernández"
            ]
            2 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "P."
              "apellidos" => "Araque"
            ]
            3 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "F."
              "apellidos" => "Olea-Serrano"
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "es"
    "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0213911102716701?idApp=WGSE"
    "url" => "/02139111/0000001600000003/v1_201310251746/S0213911102716701/v1_201310251746/es/main.assets"
  ]
  "itemAnterior" => array:19 [
    "pii" => "S0213911102716683"
    "issn" => "02139111"
    "doi" => "10.1016/S0213-9111(02)71668-3"
    "estado" => "S300"
    "fechaPublicacion" => "2002-05-01"
    "aid" => "71668"
    "copyright" => "Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria"
    "documento" => "article"
    "crossmark" => 0
    "licencia" => "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"
    "subdocumento" => "fla"
    "cita" => "Gac Sanit. 2002;16:241-3"
    "abierto" => array:3 [
      "ES" => true
      "ES2" => true
      "LATM" => true
    ]
    "gratuito" => true
    "lecturas" => array:2 [
      "total" => 3027
      "formatos" => array:3 [
        "EPUB" => 110
        "HTML" => 2465
        "PDF" => 452
      ]
    ]
    "es" => array:10 [
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
      "titulo" => "Subproductos halogenados de la cloración en el agua de consumo público"
      "tienePdf" => "es"
      "tieneTextoCompleto" => 0
      "tieneResumen" => array:2 [
        0 => "es"
        1 => "en"
      ]
      "paginas" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "paginaInicial" => "241"
          "paginaFinal" => "243"
        ]
      ]
      "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
        "en" => array:1 [
          "titulo" => "Halogenated by-products of chlorination in tap water"
        ]
      ]
      "contieneResumen" => array:2 [
        "es" => true
        "en" => true
      ]
      "contienePdf" => array:1 [
        "es" => true
      ]
      "autores" => array:2 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "J. Calderón"
          "autores" => array:1 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "J."
              "apellidos" => "Calderón"
            ]
          ]
        ]
        1 => array:2 [
          "autoresLista" => "C. Capell, F. Centrich, L. Artazcoz, M. González-Cabré, J.R. Villalbí"
          "autores" => array:5 [
            0 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "C."
              "apellidos" => "Capell"
            ]
            1 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "F."
              "apellidos" => "Centrich"
            ]
            2 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "L."
              "apellidos" => "Artazcoz"
            ]
            3 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "M."
              "apellidos" => "González-Cabré"
            ]
            4 => array:2 [
              "nombre" => "J.R."
              "apellidos" => "Villalbí"
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "es"
    "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0213911102716683?idApp=WGSE"
    "url" => "/02139111/0000001600000003/v1_201310251746/S0213911102716683/v1_201310251746/es/main.assets"
  ]
  "es" => array:14 [
    "idiomaDefecto" => true
    "titulo" => "La calidad de las evaluaciones de manuscritos en GACETA SANITARIA"
    "tieneTextoCompleto" => 0
    "paginas" => array:1 [
      0 => array:2 [
        "paginaInicial" => "244"
        "paginaFinal" => "249"
      ]
    ]
    "autores" => array:1 [
      0 => array:4 [
        "autoresLista" => "A.M. García, A. Plasència, E. Fernández"
        "autores" => array:3 [
          0 => array:4 [
            "nombre" => "A.M."
            "apellidos" => "García"
            "email" => array:1 [
              0 => "anagar@uv.es"
            ]
            "referencia" => array:2 [
              0 => array:2 [
                "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>"
                "identificador" => "aff0005"
              ]
              1 => array:2 [
                "etiqueta" => "&#42;"
                "identificador" => "cor0005"
              ]
            ]
          ]
          1 => array:3 [
            "nombre" => "A&#46;"
            "apellidos" => "Plas&#232;ncia"
            "referencia" => array:1 [
              0 => array:2 [
                "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>"
                "identificador" => "aff0010"
              ]
            ]
          ]
          2 => array:3 [
            "nombre" => "E&#46;"
            "apellidos" => "Fern&#225;ndez"
            "referencia" => array:1 [
              0 => array:2 [
                "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>"
                "identificador" => "aff0015"
              ]
            ]
          ]
        ]
        "afiliaciones" => array:3 [
          0 => array:3 [
            "entidad" => "Equipo editorial GACETA SANITARIA Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud P&#250;blica&#44; Bromatolog&#237;a&#44; Toxicolog&#237;a y Medicina Legal&#46; Universitat de Valencia"
            "etiqueta" => "a"
            "identificador" => "aff0005"
          ]
          1 => array:3 [
            "entidad" => "Institut Municipal de Salut P&#250;blica&#46; Barcelona"
            "etiqueta" => "b"
            "identificador" => "aff0010"
          ]
          2 => array:3 [
            "entidad" => "Institut Catal&#224; d&#39;Oncologia&#46; Barcelona"
            "etiqueta" => "c"
            "identificador" => "aff0015"
          ]
        ]
        "correspondencia" => array:1 [
          0 => array:3 [
            "identificador" => "cor0005"
            "etiqueta" => "&#42;"
            "correspondencia" => "<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Correspondencia&#58;</span> A&#46;M&#46; Garc&#237;a&#46; Facultad de Ciencias Sociales&#46; Avda&#46; Tarongers&#44; s&#47;n&#46; 46022 Valencia&#46;"
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [
      "en" => array:1 [
        "titulo" => "Quality of manuscript evaluation in GACETA SANITARIA"
      ]
    ]
    "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf"
    "tienePdf" => true
    "fechaRecibido" => "2002-03-07"
    "fechaAceptado" => "2002-04-10"
    "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [
      "es" => array:1 [
        0 => array:4 [
          "clase" => "keyword"
          "titulo" => "Palabras clave"
          "identificador" => "xpalclavsec268873"
          "palabras" => array:2 [
            0 => "Investigaci&#243;n revisada por pares"
            1 => "Publicaciones peri&#243;dicas"
          ]
        ]
      ]
      "en" => array:1 [
        0 => array:4 [
          "clase" => "keyword"
          "titulo" => "key words"
          "identificador" => "xpalclavsec268872"
          "palabras" => array:2 [
            0 => "Peer review"
            1 => "Research periodicals"
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
    "tieneResumen" => true
    "resumen" => array:2 [
      "es" => array:2 [
        "titulo" => "Resumen"
        "resumen" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Objetivo</span><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Describir las cualidades y limitaciones de las evaluaciones externas de los manuscritos remitidos a GACETA SANITARIA para mejorar la selecci&#243;n de los evaluadores&#44; aumentar la calidad de las evaluaciones y establecer un sistema interno que pudiera incorporarse al proceso editorial de gesti&#243;n de los manuscritos&#46;</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">M&#233;todos</span><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se incluyeron 100 evaluaciones de 55 manuscritos recibidos durante los a&#241;os 2000 y 2001&#46; Se aplic&#243; un formulario de preguntas cerradas en el que se valoraban aspectos espec&#237;ficos y generales de calidad en las evaluaciones &#40;respuestas s&#237;&#47;no o sobre una escala de 1 a 5&#41;&#46; Se llev&#243; a cabo un an&#225;lisis descriptivo y de correlaci&#243;n entre los distintos &#237;tems del formulario&#46; Se calcul&#243; un &#205;ndice de Calidad como suma de las puntuaciones de los &#237;tems espec&#237;ficos&#46;</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Resultados</span><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Las evaluaciones obtuvieron puntuaciones m&#225;s elevadas en relaci&#243;n con la compleci&#243;n del formulario para los revisores &#40;84&#37;&#41;&#44; la utilizaci&#243;n de un tono constructivo con los autores &#40;evaluaciones por encima de 3&#58; 63&#37;&#41;&#44; la identificaci&#243;n de cualidades y limitaciones metodol&#243;gicas &#40;evaluaciones por encima de 3&#58; 59&#37;&#41; y la fundamentaci&#243;n de los comentarios del evaluador &#40;evaluaciones por encima de 3&#58; 58&#37;&#41;&#46; Con menor frecuencia&#44; se valora la relevancia &#40;evaluaciones por encima de 3&#58; 40&#37;&#41; o la originalidad &#40;evaluaciones por encima de 3&#58; 35&#37;&#41; del manuscrito&#46; La utilidad global de la evaluaci&#243;n para el editor y la calidad global de la evaluaci&#243;n mostraron una elevada correlaci&#243;n con el resto de &#237;tems espec&#237;ficos en el formulario y con el &#205;ndice de Calidad&#46;</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La calidad general de las evaluaciones externas de manuscritos en GACETA SANITARIA se puede considerar alta&#46; Se ponen de manifiesto los aspectos mejorables de las evaluaciones&#46; Se podr&#237;a establecer un proceso sistem&#225;tico de valoraci&#243;n de las evaluaciones externas utilizando indicadores simples como la valoraci&#243;n global de la utilidad o de la calidad de la evaluaci&#243;n en su conjunto&#46;</p>"
      ]
      "en" => array:2 [
        "titulo" => "Abstract"
        "resumen" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Objective</span><p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">To describe strengths and weaknesses of peer reviews of manuscripts received in GACETA SANITARIA in order to guide reviewers selection&#44; to improve quality of peer reviews and to establish an internal system to be incorporated to the editorial process of handling manuscripts&#46;</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Methods</span><p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">100 peer reviews of 55 manuscripts received during 2000 and 2001 were included&#46; A questionnaire containing closed questions assessing specific and general components of reviews&#39; quality was applied &#40;answers Yes&#47;No or on a 5-points scale&#41;&#46; Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed for the different items in the questionnaire&#46; An Index of Quality was obtained by adding the ratings on the items in the questionnaire measuring specific quality components&#46;</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Results</span><p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Peer reviews were rated high regarding completeness of the forms for reviewers &#40;84&#37;&#41;&#44; constructiveness of the comments &#40;reviews over 3&#58; 63&#37;&#41;&#44; identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the method &#40;reviews over 3&#58; 59&#37;&#41; and substantiation of the reviewer comments &#40;reviews over 3&#58; 58&#37;&#41;&#46; Assessment of the manuscript&#39;s relevance &#40;reviews over 3&#58; 40&#37;&#41; or originality &#40;reviews over 3&#58; 35&#37;&#41; were less frequent&#46;</p> <span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Quality of peer reviews in GACETA SANITARIA is good&#46; Some weaknesses in the reviews have been pointed out&#46; It is possible to establish a systematic process for assessing peer reviewers using simple indicators such as general utility of the review for the editorial decision and general quality of the review&#46;</p>"
      ]
    ]
    "bibliografia" => array:2 [
      "titulo" => "Bibliograf&#237;a"
      "seccion" => array:1 [
        0 => array:2 [
          "identificador" => "bibs0005"
          "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:21 [
            0 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0005"
              "etiqueta" => "1&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Peer review&#46; Crude and understudied&#44; but indispensable"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:2 [
                            0 => "J&#46;P&#46; Kassirer"
                            1 => "E&#46;W&#46; Campion"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "JAMA"
                        "fecha" => "1994"
                        "volumen" => "272"
                        "paginaInicial" => "96"
                        "paginaFinal" => "97"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8015140"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            1 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0010"
              "etiqueta" => "2&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:1 [
                  "referenciaCompleta" => "Rennie D&#44; Flanagin A&#46; International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication &#91;citado 21 Ene 2002&#93;&#46; Disponible en&#58; <a class="elsevierStyleInterRef" href="http://www.jama-peer.org">http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;jama-peer&#46;org</a>"
                ]
              ]
            ]
            2 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0015"
              "etiqueta" => "3&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:1 [
                  "referenciaCompleta" => "Curran CF&#46; Journal manuscript peer review&#58; research and controversies &#91;consultado 21&#47;01&#47;2002&#93;&#46; Disponible en&#58; <a class="elsevierStyleInterRef" href="http://www.jama-peer.org">http&#58;&#47;&#47;www&#46;jama-peer&#46;org</a>"
                ]
              ]
            ]
            3 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0020"
              "etiqueta" => "4&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review&#46; A randomized trial"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:4 [
                            0 => "R&#46;A&#46; McNutt"
                            1 => "A&#46;T&#46; Evans"
                            2 => "R&#46;H&#46; Fletcher"
                            3 => "S&#46;W&#46; Fletcher"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "JAMA"
                        "fecha" => "1990"
                        "volumen" => "263"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1371"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1376"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2304216"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            4 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0025"
              "etiqueta" => "5&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Ocultar la identidad de los autores y evaluadores de art&#237;culos"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "F&#46; Rodr&#237;guez Artalejo"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:4 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Gac Sanit"
                        "fecha" => "1996"
                        "paginaInicial" => "159"
                        "paginaFinal" => "160"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            5 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0030"
              "etiqueta" => "6&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Opening up BMJ peer review"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "R&#46; Smith"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Br Med J"
                        "fecha" => "1999"
                        "volumen" => "318"
                        "paginaInicial" => "4"
                        "paginaFinal" => "5"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            6 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0035"
              "etiqueta" => "7&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts&#63;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "S&#46; Goldbeck-Wood"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:4 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Br Med J"
                        "fecha" => "1998"
                        "volumen" => "316"
                        "paginaInicial" => "86"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            7 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0040"
              "etiqueta" => "8&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal&#63;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:5 [
                            0 => "N&#46; Black"
                            1 => "S&#46; Van Rooyen"
                            2 => "F&#46; Godlee"
                            3 => "R&#46; Smith"
                            4 => "S&#46; Evans"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "JAMA"
                        "fecha" => "1998"
                        "volumen" => "280"
                        "paginaInicial" => "231"
                        "paginaFinal" => "233"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9676665"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            8 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0045"
              "etiqueta" => "9&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Suit alleges misuse of peer review"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "E&#46; Marshall"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Science"
                        "fecha" => "1995"
                        "volumen" => "270"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1912"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1914"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8533077"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            9 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0050"
              "etiqueta" => "10&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:1 [
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "LibroEditado" => array:3 [
                        "titulo" => "The COPE Report 2000&#46; Annual Report of the Committee on Publication Ethics"
                        "paginaInicial" => "61"
                        "serieFecha" => "2000"
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            10 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0055"
              "etiqueta" => "11&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Development of the Review Quality Instrument &#40;RQI&#41; for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "S&#46; Van Rooyen"
                            1 => "N&#46; Black"
                            2 => "F&#46; Godlee"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "J Clin Epidemiol"
                        "fecha" => "1999"
                        "volumen" => "52"
                        "paginaInicial" => "625"
                        "paginaFinal" => "629"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10391655"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            11 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0060"
              "etiqueta" => "12&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Evaluating peer reviews&#46; Pilot testing of a grading instrument"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:6 [
                            0 => "I&#46;D&#46; Feurer"
                            1 => "G&#46;J&#46; Becker"
                            2 => "D&#46; Picus"
                            3 => "E&#46; Ramirez"
                            4 => "M&#46;D&#46; Darcy"
                            5 => "M&#46;E&#46; Hicks"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "JAMA"
                        "fecha" => "1994"
                        "volumen" => "272"
                        "paginaInicial" => "98"
                        "paginaFinal" => "100"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8015141"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            12 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0065"
              "etiqueta" => "13&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Reliability of editors&#39; subjective quality ratings of peer review manuscripts"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:4 [
                            0 => "M&#46;L&#46; Callaham"
                            1 => "W&#46;G&#46; Baxt"
                            2 => "J&#46;F&#46; Waeckerle"
                            3 => "R&#46;L&#46; Wears"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "JAMA"
                        "fecha" => "1998"
                        "volumen" => "280"
                        "paginaInicial" => "229"
                        "paginaFinal" => "231"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9676664"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            13 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0070"
              "etiqueta" => "14&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "How well does a journal&#39;s peer review process function&#63;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:2 [
                            0 => "B&#46;J&#46; Sweitzer"
                            1 => "D&#46;J&#46; Cullen"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "JAMA"
                        "fecha" => "1994"
                        "volumen" => "272"
                        "paginaInicial" => "152"
                        "paginaFinal" => "153"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8015130"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            14 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0075"
              "etiqueta" => "15&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The evolution of editorial peer review"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:2 [
                            0 => "J&#46;C&#46; Burnham"
                            1 => "K&#46; Patterson"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "JAMA"
                        "fecha" => "1990"
                        "volumen" => "263"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1323"
                        "paginaFinal" => "1329"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2406470"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            15 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0080"
              "etiqueta" => "16&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Effects of Peer Review and Editing on the Readability of Articles Published in Annals of Internal Medicine"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "J&#46;C&#46; Roberts"
                            1 => "R&#46;H&#46; Fletcher"
                            2 => "S&#46;W&#46; Fletcher"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "JAMA"
                        "fecha" => "1994"
                        "volumen" => "272"
                        "paginaInicial" => "119"
                        "paginaFinal" => "121"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8015120"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            16 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0085"
              "etiqueta" => "17&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:4 [
                            0 => "S&#46;N&#46; Goodman"
                            1 => "J&#46; Berlin"
                            2 => "S&#46;W&#46; Fletcher"
                            3 => "R&#46;H&#46; Fletcher"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Ann Int Med"
                        "fecha" => "1994"
                        "volumen" => "121"
                        "paginaInicial" => "11"
                        "paginaFinal" => "21"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8198342"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            17 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0090"
              "etiqueta" => "18&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "How good is peer review&#63;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:2 [
                            0 => "A&#46;S&#46; Relman"
                            1 => "M&#46; Angell"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1056/NEJM198909213211211"
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med"
                        "fecha" => "1989"
                        "volumen" => "321"
                        "paginaInicial" => "827"
                        "paginaFinal" => "829"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2770813"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            18 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0095"
              "etiqueta" => "19&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "M&#46;L&#46; Callaham"
                            1 => "R&#46;L&#46; Wears"
                            2 => "J&#46;F&#46; Waeckerle"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Ann Emerg Med"
                        "fecha" => "1998"
                        "volumen" => "32"
                        "paginaInicial" => "318"
                        "paginaFinal" => "322"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9737493"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            19 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0100"
              "etiqueta" => "20&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "The rewards of reading instructions from journal editors"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:1 [
                            0 => "R&#46;M&#46; Pitkin"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "doi" => "10.1056/NEJM199810013391416"
                      "Revista" => array:5 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "N Engl J Med"
                        "fecha" => "1998"
                        "volumen" => "339"
                        "paginaInicial" => "1006"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9766990"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
            20 => array:3 [
              "identificador" => "bib0105"
              "etiqueta" => "21&#46;"
              "referencia" => array:1 [
                0 => array:2 [
                  "contribucion" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:2 [
                      "titulo" => "La revisi&#243;n por pares&#58; &#191;buena&#44; mala o todo lo contrario&#63;"
                      "autores" => array:1 [
                        0 => array:2 [
                          "etal" => false
                          "autores" => array:3 [
                            0 => "A&#46; Plasencia"
                            1 => "A&#46;M&#46; Garc&#237;a"
                            2 => "E&#46; Fern&#225;ndez"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                  "host" => array:1 [
                    0 => array:1 [
                      "Revista" => array:6 [
                        "tituloSerie" => "Gac Sanit"
                        "fecha" => "2001"
                        "volumen" => "15"
                        "paginaInicial" => "378"
                        "paginaFinal" => "379"
                        "link" => array:1 [
                          0 => array:2 [
                            "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11734149"
                            "web" => "Medline"
                          ]
                        ]
                      ]
                    ]
                  ]
                ]
              ]
            ]
          ]
        ]
      ]
    ]
  ]
  "idiomaDefecto" => "es"
  "url" => "/02139111/0000001600000003/v1_201310251746/S0213911102716695/v1_201310251746/es/main.assets"
  "Apartado" => array:4 [
    "identificador" => "20422"
    "tipo" => "SECCION"
    "es" => array:2 [
      "titulo" => "Especial"
      "idiomaDefecto" => true
    ]
    "idiomaDefecto" => "es"
  ]
  "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/02139111/0000001600000003/v1_201310251746/S0213911102716695/v1_201310251746/es/main.pdf?idApp=WGSE&text.app=https://gacetasanitaria.org/"
  "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0213911102716695?idApp=WGSE"
]
Compartir
Publique en esta revista
Información de la revista

Respuestas rápidas

Nueva respuesta rápida:

Requisitos y consideraciones

  • Las respuestas rápidas tienen como objetivo permitir el debate sobre observaciones científicas y de opinión sobre trabajos publicados el último año.
  • Deben ser enviadas desde la página web correspondiente al artículo en cuestión (no a través del sistema general de envío de artículos).
  • Son moderadas antes de su publicación a discreción del equipo editorial de la revista, no obstante no son peer-reviewed.
  • Deben ser originales y no infringir los derechos propiedad de terceros.
  • Los/las autores/as perderán el derecho a borrar o editar el texto, una vez sea publicado. Asimismo, la revista se reserva el derecho de borrar o editar el texto a discreción.
  • Algunas respuestas rápidas podrían ser seleccionadas adicionalmente para su publicación como cartas en la revista, en este caso seguirán el proceso editorial correspondiente.
  • Las respuestas rápidas serán publicadas en la web de la revista en 1 semana aproximadamente, después del envío del texto por parte de los/as autores/as.
  • La extensión máxima será de 500 palabras. Se admitirá una tabla o figura y hasta 5 referencias bibliográficas.
  • Se comunicará a los/las autores/ras del artículo comentado la existencia de la carta y la posibilidad de respuesta.
  • Al enviar esta respuesta rápida los autores/as aceptan los requisitos descritos.

Respuesta

Conflictos de interés

Los conflictos de interés pueden ser laborales, de investigación, económicos o morales. Los/las autores/as deben indicar si existe alguno de estos conflictos. Una descripción más detallada sobre los conflictos de intereses se encuentra disponible en las normas éticas de Gaceta Sanitaria.

El texto se adecua a las normas éticas de la revista
Idiomas
Gaceta Sanitaria
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?