Journal Information
Vol. 20. Issue 2.
Pages 116-123 (March - April 2006)
Vol. 20. Issue 2.
Pages 116-123 (March - April 2006)
Originales
Open Access
La calidad de la atención al hombro doloroso. Audit clínico
The quality of care in pain shoulder. A medical audit
Visits
1016
Manuel Marín-Gómeza,b, María José Navarro-Colladob,c, Salvador Peiróa,b,
Corresponding author
peiro_bor@gva.es

Correspondencia: Salvador Peiró. Escuela Valenciana de Estudios de la Salud. Juan de Garay, 21. 46017 Valencia. España.
, Carlos Trenor-Gomisc, Alfonso Payá-Rubioc, Enrique Bernal-Delgadob,d, Antonio Hernández-Royoe
a Escuela Valenciana de Estudios de la Salud, Conselleria de Sanitat, Valencia, España
b Fundación Instituto de Investigación en Servicios de Salud, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, España
c Servicio de Rehabilitación, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, España
d Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, Zaragoza, España
e Servicio de Rehabilitación, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, España
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Resumen
Fundamento

Valorar la calidad de la atención al hombro doloroso no quirúrgico en la consulta externa hospitalaria mediante la revisión de historias clínicas (HC) y su contraste con indicadores de calidad.

Material y métodos

Revisión retrospectiva de 245 HC de pacientes no quirúrgicos atendidos por hombro doloroso entre 1999-2000 en dos hospitales públicos. Se establecieron indicadores de calidad de la anamnesis, exploración física, diagnóstico y tratamiento, basados en revisiones sistemáticas de ensayos clínicos, guías de práctica y revisión por expertos. La revisión de HC se realizó por dos médicos rehabilitadores y se analizó la cumplimentación de los criterios de calidad y las diferencias entre hospitales.

Resultados

Un 76,3% de las HC no recogía4 de los 10 criterios de calidad de la anamnesis, un 61,6% no incluía3 de los 10 criterios de calidad de la exploración física y un 7,7% no tenía el diagnóstico anotado. El 96,9% de los 98 pacientes con síndrome subacromial no cumplía el criterio de tratamiento antiinflamatorio o infiltración en los tiempos preestablecidos, y a un 15,3% no se le había propuesto fisioterapia o ejercicio programado en las 4 semanas tras el diagnóstico; al 95,8% de los 24 pacientes con rotura del manguito de rotadores no se le propuso evaluación temprana para posible cirugía, y el 86,7% de los 15 casos de capsulitis adhesiva no recibió instrucciones para realizar ejercicio programado en los tiempos propuestos.

Conclusiones

Hay importantes insuficiencias en la calidad de la atención al hombro doloroso o en su registro en la HC.

Palabras clave:
Hombro doloroso
Audit médico
Calidad asistencial
Rehabilitación
Atención ambulatoria
Abstract
Background

To evaluate the quality of hospital ambulatory care in non-surgical painful shoulder by auditing medical records using quality indicators.

Material and methods

We reviewed 245 medical records of non-surgical patients assisted for pain shoulder in 1999-2000 in two public hospitals. Quality of care indicators for antecedents, physic exploration, diagnosis and treatment were developed based in systematic reviews of clinical trials, guidelines and expert criteria. Medical records review was carried out by two rehabilitative doctors. Fulfilling of quality criteria and differences between hospitals was analyzed.

Results

76.3% of the medical records did not fulfill ≥ 4 of 10 quality criteria for antecedents, 61.6% did not fulfill ≥ 3 of 10 criteria for physical exploration, and 7.7% did not have any diagnosis registered. 96.9% of the 98 patients with impingement syndrome did not complete the criteria of anti-inflammatory treatment or infiltration in the pre-established time, and up to 15.3% had not been proposed physiotherapy or programmed exercise in the 4 weeks after the diagnosis; 95.8% of the 24 patients with rotators cuff tears were not proposed for early surgical evaluation, and 86.7% of the 15 cases of adhesive capsulitis did not receive instructions to carry out programmed exercise in the proposed times.

Conclusions

The audit revealed significant deficiencies in adherence to quality indicators in non-surgical pain shoulder. Part of these problems can be due to low medical records quality.

Key words:
Shoulder Pain
Medical Audit
Quality of Health Care
Rehabilitation
Ambulatory Care
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
D.L. Smith, S.M. Campbell.
Painful shoulder syndromes: diagnosis and management.
J Gen Intern Med, 7 (1992), pp. 328-339
[2.]
J.J. Luime, B.W. Koes, I.J.M. Hendriksen, A. Burdof, A.P. Verhagen, H.S. Miedema, et al.
Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review.
Scand J Rheumatol, 33 (2004), pp. 73-81
[3.]
M.R. Gómez, P.G. Diz, G.L. Barros, C.S. Gómez, M.J. Lozano Eire, L.P. Robisco, et al.
Estudio epidemiológico de la patología dolorosa del hombro en nuestro medio.
Rev Esp Reumatol, 24 (1997), pp. 247-250
[4.]
N. Gómez Raso, N. López Martínez.
Patología del manguito de rotadores. ¿Un cajón de sastre?.
Rev Soc Madr Med Fam Comunitaria, 1 (2001), pp. 18-20
[5.]
D.A.W.M. Van der Windt, B.W. Koes, A.J.P. Boeke, W. Deville, B.A. De Jong, L.M. Bouter.
Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome.
Br J Gen Pract, 46 (1996), pp. 519-523
[6.]
M. Urwin, D. Symmons, T. Allison, T. Brammah, H. Busby, M. Roxby, et al.
Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation.
Ann Rheum Dis, 57 (1998), pp. 649-655
[7.]
P.M. Bongers.
The costs of shoulder pain at work.
Br Med J, 322 (2001), pp. 64-65
[8.]
P. Croft, D. Pope, A. Silman.
The clinical course of shoulder pain: prospective cohort study in primary care.
Br Med J, 313 (1996), pp. 601-602
[9.]
H. Hearnshaw, R. Harker, F. Cheater, R. Baker, G. Grimshaw.
A study of the methods used to select review criteria for clinical audit.
Health Technol Assess, 6 (2002), pp. 1-70
[10.]
Kerr EA, Asch SM, Hamilton EG, McGlynn EA, editors. Quality of Care for General Medical Conditions: a review of the literature and quality indicators. Santa Mónica: Rand; 2000. Disponible en: http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1280/
[11.]
Diamant AL. Orthopedic conditions. En: Kerr EA, Asch SM, Hamilton EG, McGlynn EA, editors. Quality of care for general medical conditions: a review of the literature and quality indicators. Santa Mónica: Rand; 2000. p. 225-46. Disponible en: http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1280/mr1280.ch16.pdf
[12.]
E.A. McGlynn, S.M. Asch, J. Adams, J. Keesey, J. Hicks, A. De- Cristofaro, et al.
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.
N Engl J Med, 348 (2003), pp. 2635-2645
[13.]
J.L. Fleiss.
The measurement of interrater agreement.
Statistical methods for rates and proportions, pp. 212-236
[14.]
A.N. Bamji, C.C. Erhardt, T.R. Price, P.L. Williams.
The painful shoulder: can consultants agree?.
Br J Rheumatol, 35 (1996), pp. 1172-1174
[15.]
A.F. De Winter, M.P. Jans, R.J. Scholten, W. Deville, D. Van Schaardenburg, L.M. Bouter.
Diagnostic classification of shoulder disorders: interobserver agreement and determinants of disagreement.
Ann Rheum Dis, 58 (1999), pp. 272-277
[16.]
Jl. Hoving, R. Buchbinder, S. Green, A. Forbes, N. Bellamy, C. Brand, et al.
How reliably do rheumatologists measure movement?.
Ann Rheum Dis, 61 (2002), pp. 612-626
[17.]
J. Norregaard, M.R. Krogsgaard, T. Lorenzen, E.M. Jensen.
Diagnosing patients with longstanding shoulder joint pain.
Ann Rheum Dis, 61 (2002), pp. 646-649
[18.]
S. Green, R. Buchbinder, R. Glazier, A. Forbes.
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder: selection criteria, outcome assessment, and efficacy.
Br Med J, 316 (1998), pp. 354-360
[19.]
S. Green, R. Buchbinder, R. Glazier, A. Forbes.
Interventions for shoulder pain (Cochrane Review).
The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Update Software, (2004),
[20.]
S. Green, R. Buchbinder, S. Hetrick.
Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain (Cochrane Review).
The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Update Software, (2004),
[21.]
R. Buchbinder, S. Green, J.M. Youd.
Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain (Cochrane Review).
The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, Update Software, (2004),
[22.]
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. AAOS clinical guideline on shoulder pain. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2001. Disponible en: http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/research/guidelin/guide.htm
[23.]
D.A. Van der Windt, G.J. Van der Heijden, R.J. Scholten, B.W. Koes, L.M. Bouter.
The efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) for shoulder complaints: a systematic review.
J Clin Epidemiol, 48 (1995), pp. 691-704
[24.]
B. Ejnisman, C.V. Andreoli, B.G.O. Soares, F. Fallopa, M.S. Peccin, R.J. Abdalla, et al.
Interventions for tears of the rotator cuff in adults (Cochrane Review).
The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, (2004),
[25.]
D.H. Solomon, J.L. Schaffer, J.N. Katz, J. Horsky, E. Burdick, E. Nadler, et al.
Can history and physical examination be used as markers of quality? An analysis of the initial visit note in musculoskeletal care.
Med Care, 38 (2000), pp. 383-391
Copyright © 2006. Sociedad Española de Salud Pública y Administración Sanitaria
Download PDF
Idiomas
Gaceta Sanitaria
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?