Información de la revista
Vol. 33. Núm. 1.
Páginas e1-e4 Páginas 1-94 (Enero - Febrero 2019)
Respuestas rápidas
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
812
Vol. 33. Núm. 1.
Páginas e1-e4 Páginas 1-94 (Enero - Febrero 2019)
Letter to the Editor
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.06.015
Open Access
Misconduct and retraction
Malas prácticas y retractación
Visitas
812
Beuy Jooba,
Autor para correspondencia
beuyjoob@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Viroj Wiwaanitkitb
a Sanitation 1 Medical Academic Center, Bangkok, Thailand
b Dr DY Patil University, Pune, India
Este artículo ha recibido
812
Visitas

Under a Creative Commons license
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Texto completo
Dear Editor:

We read the publication Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors with a great interest.1 The authors noted that «Specific strategies to limit this phenomenon must be implemented. It would be useful to standardize reasons and procedures for retraction. The development of a standard retraction form to be permanently indexed in a database might be relevant», and also noted for the observation of high number of retractions from Iran, China and Egypt. In fact, the misconduct is common problem and is observable in any countries. The mentioned three countries might have good system for monitoring the problem and management of misconduct observed in post publication period. Indeed, the management of the problematic publication is an interesting issue. Some problematic publications are neglected by publishers and the poor publishers, especially for predatory publishers, sometimes support the publications of works with misconducts.2,3 The development of standard guideline for retraction is required and there should be the international collaboration for management of the problem.

Authorship contributions

Contribution: Joob 50%; Wiwanitkit 50%.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References
[1]
I. Campos-Varela, A. Ruano-Raviña.
Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors.
Gac Sanit., (2018), pp. 30072-30074
pii: S0213-9111 [Epub ahead of print]
[2]
V. Wiwanitkit.
Plagiarism, management, journal retraction and response by author's institute.
Saudi J Anaesth., 7 (2013), pp. 223
[3]
A.Y. Gasparyan, B. Nurmashev, B. Seksenbayev, et al.
Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies.
Korean Med Sci., 32 (2017), pp. 1220-1227
Copyright © 2018. SESPAS
Idiomas
Gaceta Sanitaria

Suscríbase a la newsletter

Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.