Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 121, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 408-416
Ophthalmology

Original article
Visual Impairment and Blindness in Spanish Adults: Geographic Inequalities Are Not Explained by Age or Education

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.017Get rights and content

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to examine for the first time the prevalence of visual impairment and blindness among adults in Spain, to explore regional differences, and to assess whether they may vary as a function of sex or be explained by age and individual or regional socioeconomic position.

Design

Data were obtained from the 2008 Spanish Survey on Disability, Personal Autonomy, and Dependency Situations, a cross-sectional survey based on a representative sample of the noninstitutionalized population of Spain.

Participants

The sample was composed of 213 626 participants aged ≥15 years (103 093 men and 110 533 women); 360 were blind (160 men and 200 women), 4048 had near visual impairment (1397 men and 2651 women), and 4034 had distance visual impairment (1445 men and 2589 women).

Methods

The prevalence of near and distance visual impairment was calculated for each region. Multiple logistic regression models were fitted to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. All analyses were stratified by sex.

Main Outcome Measures

Visual impairment was based on 3 questions aimed at identifying blindness and near and distance visual impairment.

Results

The prevalence (percentage) of blindness was 0.17 (men, 0.16; women, 0.18): 1.89 for near visual impairment (men, 1.36; women, 2.40), 1.89 for distance visual impairment (men, 1.40; women, 2.34), and 2.43 for any visual impairment (men, 1.81; women, 3.02). Regional inequalities in the prevalence of visual impairment were observed, correlated with regional income, and the prevalence was consistently higher among women than men. The magnitude of the inequalities remained after adjusting for age and educational level, and a north-to-south pattern of increasing prevalence was observed.

Conclusions

Regional and sex inequalities in the prevalence of visual impairment and blindness were observed in Spain, with a north-to-south gradient of increasing prevalence that was not explained by age or individual educational level but was correlated with regional level of economic development. Factors that could be prioritized for future policies and research include differential regional economic development, rural environment, quality of eye care services, diabetes, ultraviolet light exposure, or gender inequalities in diagnostic and therapeutic health care.

Section snippets

Sample

Data were obtained from the 2008 Spanish Survey on Disability, Personal Autonomy and Dependency Situations, a cross-sectional survey based on a representative sample of the noninstitutionalized population of Spain. The questionnaire included self-reported information on visual impairment and sociodemographic data. The sample was selected using a multiple-stage random sample strategy. The first-stage units were census tracts, and the second-stage units were family households. One adult aged ≥15

Description of the Sample and General Prevalence

Descriptive statistics for the entire sample are shown in Table 1. The overall prevalence of blindness was 0.17% (men, 0.16%; women, 0.18%): 1.89% for near visual impairment (men, 1.36%; women, 2.40%), 1.89% for distance visual impairment (men, 1.40%; women, 2.34%), and 2.43% for any visual impairment (men, 1.81%; women, 3.02%). People with visual impairment had a different sociodemographic profile compared with others. Distribution of visual impairment was higher among individuals aged more

Discussion

The study has produced 4 main findings: (1) There are regional inequalities in the prevalence of visual impairment in Spain, an example of a high-income country; (2) the prevalence of visual impairment and blindness among women was consistently higher than among men in most regions; (3) these inequalities remained after adjusting for age and education, and prevalence was correlated with regional GDP; and (4) a north-to-south pattern of increasing prevalence was observed.

This study was based on

References (42)

  • J. Zhao et al.

    Prevalence of vision impairment in older adults in rural China: the China Nine-Province Survey

    Ophthalmology

    (2010)
  • M.Z. Jadoon et al.

    Prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in Pakistan: the Pakistan National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2006)
  • M.M. Rabiu et al.

    Nigeria National Blindness and Visual Impairment Study Group. Ecological determinants of blindness in Nigeria: the Nigeria National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey

    S Afr Med J

    (2011)
  • L. Dandona et al.

    Blindness in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2001)
  • Visual impairment and eye care among older adults–five states, 2005

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2006)
  • A.J. Sit et al.

    Blindness registrations and socioeconomic factors in Canada: an ecologic study

    Ophthalmic Epidemiol

    (2004)
  • A.P. Brezin et al.

    Prevalence and burden of self-reported blindness, low vision, and visual impairment in the French community: a nationwide survey

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2005)
  • R. Dandona et al.

    Socioeconomic status and blindness

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2001)
  • V.H. Ho et al.

    Social economic development in the prevention of global blindness

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (2001)
  • O. Solar et al.

    A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health: Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2

    (2010)
  • A.J. Lafuma et al.

    Prevalence of visual impairment in relation to the number of ophthalmologists in a given area: a nationwide approach

    Health Qual Life Outcomes [serial online]

    (2006)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Age-related eye disease and gender

      2016, Maturitas
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies have demonstrated lower diagnostic and therapeutic efforts in women [91,92]. Rius et al. demonstrated a higher disparity between diagnosis of cataract and rates of surgery among women than men, indicating that more women were waiting for cataract extraction, thus a lower therapeutic effort [93]. Since cataract is the leading cause of blindness worldwide, gender inequity in access to cataract surgery is a major cause of the higher prevalence of visual impairment and blindness in women [94,95].

    • Inequities in visual health and health services use in a rural region in Spain

      2018, Gaceta Sanitaria
      Citation Excerpt :

      Live in rural areas has been shown as a risk factor for certain common eye conditions such as cataracts or diabetic retinopathy compared to urban populations.7 During the last decade, the prevalence of visual impairment is growing in Spain and is unequally distributed among groups with an increased risk in lower-income regions.8 National surveys on the prevalence of blindness and visual disability in Spain show that these problems affect more than 900,000 people, of whom 69% are over age 65 and two thirds are women;9 life expectancy may contribute to this gap as in Spain is greater in women than in men, 86.2 years versus 80.4 years.10

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

    View full text