Elsevier

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volume 104, December 2018, Pages 136-139
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Controversy and Debate: Memory based Methods Paper
Controversy and debate: Memory-Based Methods Paper 4

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.004Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (30)

  • X. Gu et al.

    Reply to E archer

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2017)
  • K.J. Rothman et al.

    Modern Epidemiology

    (2008)
  • D. Spiegelman et al.

    Measurement error correction for logistic regression models with an “alloyed gold standard”

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1997)
  • D.A. Bennett et al.

    Systematic review of statistical approaches to quantify, or correct for, measurement error in a continuous exposure in nutritional epidemiology

    BMC Med Res Methodol

    (2017)
  • F.B. Hu et al.

    Dietary fat intake and the risk of coronary heart disease in women

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Parent-reported birth information: birth weight, birth length and gestational age. Validation study in the SENDO project

      2021, Gaceta Sanitaria
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lately, the use of self-reported information in epidemiological research has been criticized. However arguments against self-reported information sometimes show a lack of understanding of basic principles in epidemiology.23,24 We observed a high response rate on birth information (over 99% for birth weight and gestational age).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: None.

    Conflict of interest: None.

    View full text