Different patient groups request different emergency care – A survey in a Swedish emergency department
Introduction
Studies show that patients are not always satisfied with the care received in emergency departments (Hansagi et al., 1992, Nyström et al., 2003, Cooke et al., 2006, Nuñez et al., 2006). Frequent organizational changes and changes in political and economical conditions constitute a challenge for the health care service of today (Aiken et al., 2001, Forsberg et al., 2001, Mortimore and Cooper, 2007). In order to maintain high quality of care despite such changes, it is necessary to focus on health care from the patient’s point of view (Koziol-McLain et al., 2000). Furthermore, there is a growing awareness in hospitals and communities in general of the importance of safety improvements. It is vital that we understand the relationship between quality and safety (Institute of Medicine, 2000, Kyrkjebø, 2004), as the level of patient safety influences the level of patient satisfaction (Boudreaux et al., 2000, Zed et al., 2005).
Section snippets
Background
A Swedish study (Muntlin et al., 2006) at a university hospital found a variation in how patients perceived the quality of care in the emergency department (ED). One reason for this could be that patients have different demands for care depending on their particular ailments and situation. About one fifth of the patients rated some parts of the care as being of low quality, for example, the respect and empathy shown by ED personnel, pain relief, nutrition, and the care environment. On the other
Study design
The study utilized a prospective, descriptive survey design.
Setting
The study was conducted in the main ED of a Swedish university hospital. The hospital is a level 1 trauma centre that served about 46,000 patients per year (mean age = 54, 50% women, 50% men). At the time of the study, the ED covered three medical specialties: internal medicine, general surgery and orthopedic surgery.
Personnel and work routines
For each specialty and shift at the ED, there were one or two physicians, one or two registered nurses (RNs) and two
Results
In several dimensions and factors, the results showed differences in how the patients perceived the quality of care (Table 3).
Discussion
The present study shows that patient background and visit characteristics were related to how the patients rated the quality of care. There were differences in several factors in the dimensions of identity-oriented approach, physical–technical conditions and sociocultural atmosphere. However, the results showed no significant differences in the factors measuring the medical–technical competence dimension. This suggests that the patient’s experiences of medical care and waiting time were
Conclusions
Different patient groups perceived the quality of care in the ED in different ways depending on their age, education, reasons for attending the ED, medical specialty or medical outcome. Clinical guidelines for different patient groups might facilitate the quality improvement work in the ED. These guidelines could focus on nutrition status for general surgery patients, regularly education and practice of communication skills, continuing information during the whole ED visit, developing the
Conflict of interest
The authors could not identify any potential conflicts of interest.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Emergency Department of University Hospital Uppsala, and the Swedish Society of Nursing (SSF). Apart from providing the funding and access, they had no other input or involvement in the study.
Acknowledgement
We would like to extend special thanks to Anne-Sophie Norrman Saleh Lavasani for help with the data collection.
References (34)
- et al.
Determinants of patient satisfaction in a large, municipal ED: the role of demographic variables, visit characteristics and patient perceptions
Am. J. Emerg. Med.
(2000) - et al.
Patient satisfaction in the emergency department: a review of the literature and implications of practice
J. Emerg. Med.
(2004) - et al.
Financial incentives in health care. The impact of performance-based reimbursement
Health Policy
(2001) - et al.
of care from the patient’s perspective in pediatric diabetes care
Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract.
(2006) - et al.
Seeking care for nonurgent medical conditions in the emergency department: through the eyes of the patient
J. Emerg. Nurs.
(2000) - et al.
Factors associated with older patients’ satisfaction with care in an inner-city emergency department
Ann. Emerg. Med.
(2001) - et al.
Being a non-urgent patient in an emergency care unit – a strive to maintain personal integrity
Accid. Emerg. Nurs.
(2003) - et al.
Following the patient journey: older persons’ experiences of emergency departments and discharge
Accid. Emerg. Nurs.
(2007) - et al.
Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care
Ann. Emerg. Med.
(2000) - et al.
Nurses’ reports on hospital care in five countries
Health Aff.
(2001)
Understanding Advanced Statistics. A Guide For Nurses And Health Care Researchers
Improvement, trust, and the healthcare workforce
Qual. Saf. Health Care.
Patient expectations of emergency department care: phase II – a cross-sectional survey
Can. J. Emerg. Med. Care
Evaluating emergency nurse practitioner services: a randomized controlled trial
J. Adv. Nurs.
Patients’ voices on satisfaction: unheeded women and maltreated men?
Scand. J. Caring Sci.
Injured road users’ experience of care in the emergency department
J. Clin. Nurs.
The urgency of care need and patient satisfaction at a hospital emergency department
Health Care Manage. Rev.
Cited by (21)
A New Perspective on Missed Nursing Care in the Emergency Department: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study
2024, Journal of Emergency NursingMigration background and overall satisfaction with pre-hospital emergency care
2016, Applied Nursing ResearchCitation Excerpt :However, final conclusions cannot be drawn from these results (Hall & Dornan, 1990). Findings associated primarily with gender have no significant link to the perceived quality of emergency department care (Boudreaux, Ary, Mandry, & McCabe, 2000; Goldwag et al., 2002; Hall & Press, 1996; Muntlin, Gunningberg, & Carlsson, 2008). In relation to age, some studies have shown no correlation to overall satisfaction (Boudreaux et al., 2000, 2004; Goldwag et al., 2002; Hall & Press, 1996), whereas others have found significant positive correlations between rising age and overall satisfaction with emergency department care (Hall & Dornan, 1990; Rahmqvist, 2001; Rahmqvist & Bara, 2010).
To Receive or Not to Receive Analgesics in the Emergency Department: The Importance of the Pain Intensity Assessment and Initial Nursing Assessment
2015, Pain Management NursingCitation Excerpt :However, pain intensity assessment and the use of pain intensity scales are not always seen as a mandatory parameter of the initial assessment of the patient. A Swedish research project addressing improving the quality of care in an ED used patient questionnaires and focus group interviews with staff members (i.e., physicians, RNs, and assistant nurses) to develop an approach to improve pain management in the ED (Muntlin et al., 2006, 2008; Muntlin, Carlsson, Säfwenberg, & Gunningberg, 2011). Thereafter, a quasi-experimental study with an ABA design was undertaken on the impact of a nurse-initiated analgesic protocol in the ED.
Postoperative health and patients' experiences of efficiency and quality of care after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, two to six months after surgery
2015, European Journal of Oncology NursingCitation Excerpt :Inter-personal aspects such as quality of care from patients' perspectives indicated that patients were dissatisfied with how examination results were reported back to them; with the information they received regarding treatment and self-care; with the lack of opportunity to be involved in their own care, and with the lack of empathy and respect shown towards them. ( Fröjd et al., 2011; Muntlin et al., 2008). Quality of care and efficiency is defined by the patient's on micro level which refers to the primary process in which health care provision and consumption takes place (WHO).
Toward patient-centered care: A systematic review of older adults' views of quality emergency care
2014, Annals of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Consequently, they find many aspects of the standard emergency care environment uncomfortable. Although Muntlin et al31 found that older patients had higher overall ratings of quality with emergency care than younger adults, many studies identified specific structural areas that could be more patient-centered, including items being out of reach (eg, call lights), the noise level, lack of natural light, safety concerns within the ED (eg, loose cords or wires), inadequate toilet facilities, and unpleasant waiting rooms.15,17,19,22-25,35,36 When patients did have these needs addressed, the response was overwhelmingly positive.