Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 51, Issue 15, October 2015, Pages 2191-2205
European Journal of Cancer

Survival of women with cancers of breast and genital organs in Europe 1999–2007: Results of the EUROCARE-5 study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Survival differences across Europe for patients with cancers of breast, uterus, cervix, ovary, vagina and vulva have been documented by previous EUROCARE studies. In the present EUROCARE-5 study we update survival estimates and investigate changes in country-specific and over time survival, discussing their relationship with incidence and mortality dynamics for cancers for which organised screening programs are ongoing.

Methods

We analysed cases archived in over 80 population-based cancer registries in 29 countries grouped into five European regions. We used the cohort approach to estimate 5-year relative survival (RS) for adult (⩾15 years) women diagnosed 2000–2007, by age, country and region; and the period approach to estimate time trends (1999–2007) in RS for breast and cervical cancers.

Results

In 2000–2007, 5-year RS was 57% overall, 82% for women diagnosed with breast, 76% with corpus uteri, 62% with cervical, 38% with ovarian, 40% with vaginal and 62% with vulvar cancer. Survival was low for patients resident in Eastern Europe (34% ovary–74% breast) and Ireland and the United Kingdom [Ireland/UK] (31–79%) and high for those resident in Northern Europe (41–85%) except Denmark. Survival decreased with advancing age: markedly for women with ovarian (71% 15–44 years; 20% ⩾75 years) and breast (86%; 72%) cancers. Survival for patients with breast and cervical cancers increased from 1999–2001 to 2005–2007, remarkably for those resident in countries with initially low survival.

Conclusions

Despite increases over time, survival for women’s cancers remained poor in Eastern Europe, likely due to advanced stage at diagnosis and/or suboptimum access to adequate care. Low survival for women living in Ireland/UK and Denmark could indicate late detection, possibly related also to referral delay. Poor survival for ovarian cancer across the continent and over time suggests the need for a major research effort to improve prognosis for this common cancer.

Introduction

Cancers of breast, uterine corpus, uterine cervix, ovary, vagina and vulva are among the commonest cancers affecting European women.

Breast cancer is the commonest cancer affecting European women, with European age-standardised incidence 71/100,000 in 2012 [1], and relatively good survival [2]. High calorie diet, obesity and lack of physical activity [3] are not only risk factors but also negatively influence prognosis. Breast cancer is commoner in women of high socioeconomic status – who have fewer children and their first child later – than low socioeconomic status women [4]. National or regional breast cancer screening programmes were implemented in many European countries starting in the 1990s [5], and resulted in earlier diagnosis, improved access to effective treatments and better organisation of care [6].

Cancer of the corpus uteri is less common (European age-standardised incidence 14/100,000 in 2012 [1]), has a relatively good prognosis, shares some aetiological factors with breast cancer (e.g. obesity [7]) and has a similar incidence distribution with age to breast cancer, reaching a maximum at around 60 years, with stable or declining incidence thereafter.

Cervical cancer occurs at a younger age than cancer of the corpus and is uncommon in Europe (age-standardised incidence 11/100,000) but common in developing countries [1]. It has a poorer prognosis than corpus uteri cancer, with European age-standardised 5-year relative survival of about 63% [2]. Cervical screening has been successful for the secondary prevention of cervical cancer [8]. Vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) have been introduced in many developed countries for the primary prevention of this cancer [9], [10].

Ovarian cancer is mainly a disease of older women, with 50% of cases occurring in women over 65 years. European age-standardised incidence was 10/100,000 in 2012 [1], the disease has a poor prognosis [2], [11].

Vaginal and vulvar cancers are rare, with European age-standardised incidence 1/100,000) [1], and relatively good prognoses [2]. Evidence is growing that HPV infection is a major cause of these cancers [9].

Survival differences across Europe and between continents have been documented by previous studies [2], [12]. The aim of the present EUROCARE-5 study was to update survival estimates for these cancers and investigate changes in country-specific and over time survival.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

After excluding lymphomas only (1280 cases), we considered invasive cancers of breast (topography code C50), uterine cervix (C53), uterine corpus (C54), ovary (C56, C570–C574, C577) and vagina/vulva (C51, C52, C578–C579), as defined by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd revision [13], diagnosed in adult (⩾15 years) women from 2000 to the end of 2007 and archived in European population-based cancer registries (CRs): 86 CRs for cancers of cervix, uterus and

Results

In 2000–2007, 5-year RS for patients with breast cancer in Europe was 82%, range 74% (Eastern Europe) to 85% (Northern Europe) (Fig. 1). Survival was uniformly high for women in countries where mass screening was offered: all Northern European countries except Denmark (82%) and uniformly low in Ireland/UK (79%). Five-year RS was also low (74%) in Eastern Europe, but well above the regional mean for the Czech Republic (78%); below for Lithuania (67%) and Latvia (69%). Among Southern European

Discussion

Survival for women’s cancers in Europe varied from high for breast and uterine corpus cancers, to poor for ovarian cancer. As regards geographic variation, the pattern was closely similar to that documented by previous EUROCARE publications [2], [22], with low survival for patients resident in Eastern Europe and Ireland/UK, and high survival for those resident in Northern Europe, except Denmark. Survival decreased steadily with advancing age at diagnosis for all cancers, again consistent with

Conclusions

Survival for patients with the cancers investigated improved from 1999 to 2007 throughout Europe, but nevertheless remained low in Eastern Europe, Ireland/UK and Denmark. Low survival in the relatively prosperous Ireland, UK and Denmark could indicate late detection (resulting in more advanced stage at diagnosis), suboptimum access to adequate care, or both. Steadily increasing survival in Eastern Europe might be related to health service reorganisation in countries of this region [54]. It is

Sources of support (grants)

The Compagnia di San Paolo, the Fondazione Cariplo Italy, the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata 2009, RF-2009-1529710) and the European Commission (European Action Against Cancer, EPAAC, Joint Action No. 20102202).

Role of funding source

The funding sources had no role in study design, the collection, analysis or interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

We thank Chiara Margutti, Simone Bonfarnuzzo and Camilla Amati for secretarial assistance, and Don Ward for help with English.

References (56)

  • J. Ferlay et al.

    Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012

    Eur J Cancer

    (2013)
  • M. Sant et al.

    Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentary

    Eur J Cancer

    (2009)
  • E. Kampman et al.

    Impact of diet, body mass index, and physical activity on cancer survival

    Curr Nutr Rep

    (2012)
  • Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer

    Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies

    Lancet Oncol

    (2012)
  • E. Altobelli et al.

    Breast cancer in European Union: an update of screening programmes as of March 2014 (Review)

    Int J Oncol

    (2014)
  • Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening

    The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • T. Bjørge et al.

    Body size in relation to cancer of the uterine corpus in 1 million Norwegian women

    Int J Cancer

    (2006)
  • R. Guido

    Secondary prevention of cervical cancer part 2: initial management of abnormal cervical cancer screening test

    Clin Obstet Gynecol

    (2014)
  • Bruni L, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, Serrano B, Brotons M, Albero G, Cosano R, et al. Human papillomavirus and related...
  • M.L. Diaz

    Prevention of cervical, vaginal, and vulval cancers: role of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine

    Int J Women’s Health

    (2009)
  • W. Oberaigner et al.

    Survival for ovarian cancer in Europe: the across-country variation did not shrink in the past decade

    Acta Oncol

    (2012)
  • C. Allemani et al.

    Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • A. Fritz et al.

    International classification of diseases for oncology

    (2000)
  • S. Rossi et al.

    The EUROCARE-5 study on cancer survival in Europe: database, quality checks and methods of statistical analysis

    Eur J Cancer

    (2015)
  • F.A. Tavassoli et al.

    World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs

    (2003)
  • H. Brenner et al.

    Deriving more up-to-date estimates of long term patient survival

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1997)
  • H. Brenner et al.

    Up-to-date long term survival curves of patients with cancer by period analysis

    J Clin Oncol

    (2002)
  • D.M. Parkin et al.

    Cancer registration: principles and methods. Analysis of survival

    IARC Sci Publ

    (1991)
  • F. Ederer et al.

    Instructions to IBM 650 Programmers in processing survival computations. Methodological note No. 10. End Results Evaluation Section

    (1959)
  • H. Brenner et al.

    Long term survival expectations of cancer patients in Europe in 2000–2002

    Eur J Cancer

    (2009)
  • I. Corazziari et al.

    Standard cancer patient population for age standardizing survival ratios

    Eur J Cancer

    (2004)
  • R. De Angelis et al.

    Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5 – a population-based study

    Lancet Oncol

    (2014)
  • M.L.G. Janssen-Heijnen et al.

    Clinical relevance of conditional survival of cancer patients in Europe: age-specific analyses of 13 cancers

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • M.P. Coleman et al.

    Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data

    Lancet

    (2011)
  • M. Pollán et al.

    Recent changes in breast cancer incidence in Spain, 1980–2004

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2009)
  • Steliarova-Foucher E, O’Callaghan M, Ferlay J, Masuyer E, Forman D, Comber H, et al. Cancer Incidence, Mortality,...
  • J. Amaro et al.

    Patterns of breast cancer mortality trends in Europe

    The Breast

    (2013)
  • M. Arnold et al.

    Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: analysis of the European Cancer Observatory

    Eur J Cancer

    (2015)
  • Cited by (210)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text