Segment characteristics and severity of head-on crashes on two-lane rural highways in Maine
Introduction
About 60% of all fatal crashes in OECD Member countries happen on rural roads (OECD, 1999) and as much as 80% of these crashes fall into three categories: single vehicle crashes (35%), head-on collisions (25%), and collisions at intersections (20%) (Wegman, 2003).
Two-lane rural highways make up a substantial proportion of the highway network in northeastern United States as in most of the world. In the state of Maine, roughly 95% of all rural highway miles are only two lanes wide. Furthermore, as the population continues to spread outside established urbanized areas as a result of population sprawl, traffic volumes on these facilities are increasing. This is expected to lead to an increased number of crashes involving vehicles traveling in opposite directions. A disturbing finding since Fig. 1 shows that head-on crashes in the late 1990s already accounted for almost half of all traffic fatalities on non-interstate rural roads in Maine even though less than 5% of all crashes there were of head-on type.
Fatal crashes will be a focus of this paper since they are responsible for about half of the crash costs when it comes to head-on collisions—as shown later in this paper. Therefore, an analysis of a small number of crashes illuminates the causation of roughly half the crash cost. Also, fatal crashes are reported to a higher degree than other ones, are the ones that are the most thoroughly investigated with respect to cause, have the most reliable data, and are the ones that easiest can be found in data banks.
Rural, non-interstate crashes, the ones presented in Fig. 1, make up a clear majority of the fatal crashes in the state of Maine. The Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) web-based encyclopedia (NCSA & NHTSA, 2005) shows that there in 2002 were 186 fatal crashes in Maine involving 272 vehicles. Fourteen (8%) of the fatal crashes occurred on rural interstate highways, 58 (31%) on other rural arterials, 55 (30%) on rural collector roads, 38 (20%) on rural local roads, and 4 on rural roads with unknown classification. There were two crashes with unknown urban/rural designation. This means that over 90% (169–171 out of 186) of the fatal crashes in the state were rural and less than 10% (15–17) occurred in urban compact areas. The fact that more than two out of three (127–133 out of 186) of all fatal crashes in Maine occurred on rural collectors/arterials means that this is where a considerable part of the safety improvement efforts ought to be concentrated. And, head-on collisions are the ones taking roughly half of all lives on these roads. Clearly, something should be done to reduce the number of head-on collisions. An obvious first step is to identify what is causing these head-on crashes – especially the fatal ones – and do whatever is necessary to reduce their occurrence, or at least their severity.
Research into what factors are correlated with head-on-crash occurrence indicates that the frequency of head-on crashes decreases with increased lane width (Al-Senan and Wright, 1987, Zegeer et al., 1981) and that most fatal head-on crashes take place on roadways with high posted speed limits (Al-Senan and Wright, 1987, Leisch, 1971) and at passing zones (Agent and Deen, 1975). Also, the vehicle crash severity is affected by speed limit (Renski et al., 1999), road width (Huang et al., 2002), and segment curvatures (Abdel-Aty, 2003). A study from New Zealand (Clissold, 1976) found that head-on collisions were over-represented in wet weather on both urban and rural roads. An analysis of 505 fatal head-on crashes in Minnesota (Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2004) shows that almost 50% (243 of 505) of the crashes were attributed to “driving left of roadway center—not passing,” which typically would indicate inattention, while 109 (22%) were classified as “illegal or unsafe speed,” 95 (19%) as “other human contributing factor,” 90 (18%) as “driver inattention or distraction,” and 73 (14%) as “improper or unsafe lane use.” Only 59 (12%) were classified as skidding and 57 (11%) as weather related in spite of Minnesota's northerly climate with long, snowy winters.
A comprehensive overview using national data on head-on collisions is provided by NCHRP (2003). Results from that study is presented later in this paper as comparison material to Maine results.
Section snippets
Data and methodology
The primary data analyzed in this study was provided by Maine Department of Transportation with listings of all the state's head-on crashes for 2000–2002. These files integrate characteristics of each crash and the roadway on which it happened; including the variables shown in Table 1. Data provided by FARS (NCSA & NHTSA, 2005) has also been used in the study.
A majority of the results presented below have been derived through comparison of crash numbers and crash severities for different
Number of head-on crashes by severity
In total, 3136 head-on crashes were reported in the state of Maine for the years 2000–2002. Out of these, 127 were fatal crashes and 235 produced incapacitating but not fatal injuries. There were 142 fatalities, 403 incapacitating injuries, 968 evident injuries and 1024 possible injuries during these 3 years.
If we use costs per injury type as recommended by FHWA (2002) with a fatal injury valued at $3,000,000, an incapacitating injury at $565,000, an evident injury at $175,000, a possible
Speed limit
Fig. 2 shows the percentage of crashes that, at a given speed limit, lead to fatal or incapacitating injuries whereas Fig. 3 shows the percentage causing fatalities. Confidence intervals assume that the recorded numbers vary around expected numbers according to a random process (Poisson distribution). There is a 2.5% probability that the ‘true’ percentage is above the shown bar and a 2.5% probability that it is below.
Overall in the United States, about 0.61% of all crashes are fatal (38,309
Conclusions and discussion
A clear majority of head-on crashes on two-lane, rural roads in Maine are caused by drivers making errors or misjudging situations. It is a well-known fact that fatigue – and actually falling asleep – is a major contributor to fatal crashes on Maine's Interstates (Gårder and Alexander, 1994). But on two-lane roads, fatigue is responsible for only around one in 40 head-on crashes and one in 12 fatal head-on crashes. Alcohol or drugs is a factor in one in 12 crashes and one in nine fatal head-on
References (27)
Analysis of driver injury severity levels at multiple locations using ordered probit models
J. Saf. Res.
(2003)- et al.
Intelligent speed adaptation: accident savings and cost-benefit analysis
Accid. Anal. Prev.
(2005) - et al.
Relationship between roadway geometrics and accidents
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 541
(1975) - Al-Senan, S.H., Wright, P.H., 1987. Prediction of head-on accident sites. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal...
- et al.
2 + 1 vägar med räcke
Väg-och Vattenbyggaren 6
(2004) Wet weather injury accidents on New Zealand roads
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 624
(1976)- Deng, Z., 2006. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Severity of Head-on Crashes on Two-lane Rural Highways, Master of...
- FHWA, 1996. Annual Vehicle Miles of Travel and Related Data. Technical Report...
- FHWA, 2002. Treatment of Value of Life and Injuries in Preparing Economic Evaluation (based on FHWA Technical Advisory...
Occurrence of evasive maneuvers prior to accidents-data from North Carolina accidents
Evaluation of lane reduction “Road Diet” measures on crashes and injuries
Transport. Res. Rec.
Cited by (63)
The influences of strict and post-strict lockdowns due to the Covid-19 pandemic on crash severity on rural roads: A case study of Khorasan Razavi, Iran
2023, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and BehaviourA data fusion approach of police-hospital linked data to examine injury severity of motor vehicle crashes
2023, Accident Analysis and PreventionEvaluating the impact of traffic violations on crash injury severity on Wyoming interstates: An investigation with a random parameters model with heterogeneity in means approach
2022, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)Risk evaluation of multiple passing maneuvers on two-lane rural highways in Iran
2021, Accident Analysis and Prevention