Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 385, Issue 9963, 10–16 January 2015, Pages 172-185
The Lancet

Series
A community empowerment approach to the HIV response among sex workers: effectiveness, challenges, and considerations for implementation and scale-up

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60973-9Get rights and content

Summary

A community empowerment-based response to HIV is a process by which sex workers take collective ownership of programmes to achieve the most effective HIV outcomes and address social and structural barriers to their overall health and human rights. Community empowerment has increasingly gained recognition as a key approach for addressing HIV in sex workers, with its focus on addressing the broad context within which the heightened risk for infection takes places in these individuals. However, large-scale implementation of community empowerment-based approaches has been scarce. We undertook a comprehensive review of community empowerment approaches for addressing HIV in sex workers. Within this effort, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of community empowerment in sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries. We found that community empowerment-based approaches to addressing HIV among sex workers were significantly associated with reductions in HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, and with increases in consistent condom use with all clients. Despite the promise of a community-empowerment approach, we identified formidable structural barriers to implementation and scale-up at various levels. These barriers include regressive international discourses and funding constraints; national laws criminalising sex work; and intersecting social stigmas, discrimination, and violence. The evidence base for community empowerment in sex workers needs to be strengthened and diversified, including its role in aiding access to, and uptake of, combination interventions for HIV prevention. Furthermore, social and political change are needed regarding the recognition of sex work as work, both globally and locally, to encourage increased support for community empowerment responses to HIV.

Introduction

Since the beginning of the HIV epidemic, sex workers have been at a substantially increased risk for HIV infection. The disproportionate burden of disease in these individuals has been further emphasised with epidemiological data from several geographical settings and epidemic types.1 Despite the global expansion of access to care and treatment, sex workers with HIV continue to face many barriers to access of services2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and have poor treatment outcomes.11, 12 These findings show that sex workers are exposed to a unique set of factors impeding their health and necessitating increased attention within the global response to HIV.

The context of sex workers' heightened risk for HIV is characterised by various social and structural constraints.13, 14, 15 Sex work is criminalised in some form in 116 countries.16 In many settings, laws, policies, and local ordinances all serve to penalise and marginalise sex workers, and to exclude them from national HIV responses.17 Sex workers experience violations of their human and labour rights. They are also frequently exposed to intersecting social stigmas, discrimination, and violence related to their occupation, gender, socioeconomic position, and HIV status.1, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21 Without addressing these powerful structural challenges, the HIV response in sex workers is likely to be ineffective and unsustainable.

Key messages

  • A community empowerment-based HIV response is a process by which sex workers take collective ownership of programmes and services to achieve the most effective HIV responses and address social and structural barriers to their health and human rights.

  • Community empowerment-based HIV prevention interventions in sex workers are associated with significant reductions in HIV and STI outcomes and increases in consistent condom use with clients. However, evaluation designs have been weak and geographically restricted. Community empowerment approaches to combination HIV prevention in sex workers are rare and should be expanded and assessed.

  • Despite the promise of community empowerment approaches to address HIV in sex workers, formidable structural barriers to implementation and scale-up exist at various levels. These barriers include regressive international discourses and funding constraints; national laws criminalising sex work; intersecting stigmas; and discrimination and violence such as that linked to occupation, gender, socioeconomic status, and HIV.

  • Results underscore the need for social and political change regarding the manner in which sex work is understood and addressed, including the need to decriminalise sex work and recognise sex work as work. To help achieve these changes, support for networks and community organisations led by sex workers are needed both globally and locally.

  • There is a need to continue to expand and strengthen the evidence base for community empowerment in sex workers, including study designs focused on better capturing and measurement of the process and the effect of empowerment efforts across diverse settings, and further investments in the generation of sex-worker-led, practice-based evidence.

A community empowerment-based response to HIV is a process by which sex workers take collective ownership of programmes to achieve the most effective HIV outcomes and address social and structural barriers to their health and human rights. These efforts are unique in that they are driven by the needs and priorities of sex workers themselves, coming together as a community. Community empowerment in sex workers has been recognised as a UNAIDS Best Practice for more than a decade,22 and continues to underpin key UN policy documents regarding HIV in sex workers.21, 23 Assessments done across various countries have shown community empowerment to be a promising approach to reduce HIV risk in sex workers.24 Results of mathematical modelling suggest that community empowerment efforts can significantly reduce HIV incidence in both sex workers and the general adult population across diverse HIV epidemic scenarios, and that these interventions are cost effective.1, 25 Despite increasing encouraging evidence, government and donor investment in community empowerment-based approaches in sex workers has been low.26, 27

We undertook a comprehensive review of the implementation, effectiveness, and barriers and facilitators of community empowerment-based HIV prevention in sex workers. Within this review, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of community empowerment in sex workers for key HIV-related outcomes. Additionally, we present four case studies emphasising the social and structural challenges faced by sex workers across settings and their collective responses to reduce their risk for HIV infection and promote their overall health and human rights.

Section snippets

What is community empowerment?

Findings from our comprehensive review showed that community empowerment-based HIV responses differ from typical HIV prevention programming in several ways. First, community empowerment approaches do not merely consult sex workers, but rather are community-led, such that they are designed, implemented, and assessed by sex workers. Second, these approaches recognise sex work as work—ie, as a legitimate occupation or livelihood—and seek to promote and protect its legal status as such. Third, they

Systematic review

Our systematic review identified 5457 unique citations, of which 22 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria for having assessed the effectiveness of community empowerment-based interventions for HIV prevention in sex workers over the past 10 years, from Feb 1, 2003, to Jan 31, 2013 (table).30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 The number of included publications more than doubled since our previous review (n=10), which included articles

How is community empowerment measured?

To date, most efforts to measure community empowerment have focused on the specific intervention activities undertaken, whereas less focus has been placed on the measurement of community empowerment as a social process. For example, most articles in our systematic review measured intervention exposure by assessment of whether participants had been contacted by a peer educator; had received condoms or other educational materials; had visited drop-in centres or health clinics; or had participated

What are the barriers and facilitators to community empowerment?

Our comprehensive review identified 110 documents from both the peer-reviewed and practice-based evidence related to implementation of community-empowerment-based responses to HIV in sex workers across various settings. From this literature, we sought to identify the most salient barriers to implementation and scale-up at the global, state, and community levels (figure 2). Additionally, we sought to capture facilitating factors and innovative responses used by sex-worker programmes to overcome

Case studies

The four case studies presented below, from Kenya, Burma, India, and Brazil, describe key elements of the context, process, barriers and facilitators, and sustainability of community empowerment.

What are the policy, programme, and research implications?

Our findings show the promise of community empowerment approaches in responding to the significantly increased risk of HIV infection in sex workers. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of the fairly weak research designs and low geographical variation of the studies in our nested meta-analysis. The heterogeneity recorded in the effects of community empowerment on specific HIV outcomes is expected in view of the nature of the approach. However, this heterogeneity further

Conclusions

The available evidence, although based on studies from a small number of projects and countries, shows that community empowerment holds great promise as an effective approach for reducing HIV risk in sex workers and that scale-up of these initiatives could contribute to curbing of the epidemic in sex workers and the general population.1, 24, 25 Our findings emphasise the deep-rooted paradigmatic challenges associated with expansion of community empowerment-based responses to HIV in sex workers.

Search strategy and selection criteria

Working collaboratively as researchers and members of the sex-worker community, we did a comprehensive search of the peer-reviewed and practice-based evidence of community empowerment-based responses to HIV in sex workers. For practice-based evidence, we searched online for, and solicited programme reports and presentations from, various organisations working on sex work and HIV prevention, including the Global Network of Sex Work Projects (NSWP) listserv. For peer-reviewed literature, we

References (101)

  • C Kennedy et al.

    Exploring the positive, health, dignity and prevention needs of female sex workers, men who have sex with men and transgender women in the Dominican Republic and Swaziland

    (2013)
  • F Scorgie et al.

    ‘We are despised in the hospitals’: sex workers' experiences of accessing health care in four African countries

    Cult Health Sex

    (2013)
  • L Ghimire et al.

    Barriers to utilisation of sexual health services by female sex workers in Nepal

    Glob J Health Sci

    (2009)
  • V Chakrapani et al.

    Barriers to free antiretroviral treatment access for female sex workers in Chennai, India

    AIDS Patient Care STDS

    (2009)
  • C Beyrer et al.

    Expanding the space: inclusion of most-at-risk populations in HIV prevention, treatment, and care services

    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

    (2011)
  • TS Beattie et al.

    Personal, interpersonal and structural challenges to accessing HIV testing, treatment and care services among female sex workers, men who have sex with men and transgenders in Karnataka state, South India

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (2012)
  • S Mtetwa et al.

    “You are wasting our drugs”: health service barriers to HIV treatment for sex workers in Zimbabwe

    BMC Public Health

    (2013)
  • S Diabaté et al.

    Antiretroviral therapy among HIV-1 infected female sex workers in Benin: a comparative study with patients from the general population

    World J AIDS

    (2011)
  • C Huet et al.

    Long-term virological, immunological and mortality outcomes in a cohort of HIV-infected female sex workers treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy in Africa

    BMC Public Health

    (2011)
  • SA Lippman et al.

    Social-environmental factors and protective sexual behavior among sex workers: the Encontros intervention in Brazil

    Am J Public Health

    (2010)
  • M Park et al.

    HIV prevention support ties determine access to HIV testing among migrant female sex workers in Beijing, China

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2011)
  • E Reed et al.

    The context of economic insecurity and its relation to violence and risk factors for HIV among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India

    Public Health Rep

    (2010)
  • A Ahmed et al.

    Criminalising consensual sexual behaviour in the context of HIV: consequences, evidence, and leadership

    Glob Public Health

    (2011)
  • MR Decker et al.

    Human rights violations against sex workers: burden and effect on HIV

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • TS Beattie et al.

    Violence against female sex workers in Karnataka state, south India: impact on health, and reductions in violence following an intervention program

    BMC Public Health

    (2010)
  • MR Decker et al.

    Injection drug use, sexual risk, violence and STI/HIV among Moscow female sex workers

    Sex Transm Infect

    (2012)
  • SN Swain et al.

    Experience of violence and adverse reproductive health outcomes, HIV risks among mobile female sex workers in India

    BMC Public Health

    (2011)
  • UNAIDS guidance note on HIV and sex work

    (2012)
  • C Jenkins

    Female sex worker HIV prevention projects: Lessons learnt from Papua New Guinea, India, and Bangladesh

    (2000)
  • Prevention and Treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections for sex workers in low-and middle-income countries: recommendations for a public health approach

    (2012)
  • DL Kerrigan et al.

    Community empowerment among female sex workers is an effective HIV prevention intervention: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed evidence from low and middle-income countries

    AIDS Behav

    (2013)
  • AL Wirtz et al.

    Epidemic impacts of a community empowerment intervention for HIV prevention among female sex workers in generalized and concentrated epidemics

    PLoS One

    (2014)
  • Global Fund HIV investments specifically targeting most-at-risk populations: an analysis of round 8 (2008)

    (2011)
  • N Bandyopadhyay et al.

    The role of community development approaches in ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of interventions to reduce HIV transmission through commercial sex: case study of the Sonagachi Project, Kolkata, India

    (2004)
  • Understanding and acting on critical enablers and development synergies for strategic investments

    (2012)
  • R Adhikary et al.

    Decline in unprotected sex & sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among female sex workers from repeated behavioural & biological surveys in three southern States of India

    Indian J Med Res

    (2012)
  • JT Erausquin et al.

    Trends in condom use among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India: the impact of a community mobilisation intervention

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (2012)
  • M Guha et al.

    Risk reduction and perceived collective efficacy and community support among female sex workers in Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, India: the importance of context

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (2012)
  • SA Lippman et al.

    Findings From Encontros: a multilevel sti/hiv intervention to increase condom use, reduce sti, and change the social environment among sex workers in Brazil

    Sex Transm Dis

    (2012)
  • I Basu et al.

    HIV prevention among sex workers in India

    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

    (2004)
  • KM Blankenship et al.

    Power, community mobilization, and condom use practices among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India

    AIDS

    (2008)
  • DN Gangopadhyay et al.

    Evaluation of sexually transmitted diseases/human immunodeficiency virus intervention programs for sex workers in Calcutta, India

    Sex Transm Dis

    (2005)
  • SS Halli et al.

    The role of collectives in STI and HIV/AIDS prevention among female sex workers in Karnataka, India

    AIDS Care

    (2006)
  • D Kerrigan et al.

    Environmental-structural interventions to reduce HIV/STI risk among female sex workers in the Dominican Republic

    Am J Public Health

    (2006)
  • D Kerrigan et al.

    Community development and HIV/STI-related vulnerability among female sex workers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Health Educ Res

    (2008)
  • SA Lippman et al.

    Inverse probability weighting in sexually transmitted infection/human immunodeficiency virus prevention research: methods for evaluating social and community interventions

    Sex Transm Dis

    (2010)
  • BM Ramesh et al.

    Changes in risk behaviours and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections following HIV preventive interventions among female sex workers in five districts in Karnataka state, south India

    Sex Transm Infect

    (2010)
  • S Reza-Paul et al.

    Declines in risk behaviour and sexually transmitted infection prevalence following a community-led HIV preventive intervention among female sex workers in Mysore, India

    AIDS

    (2008)
  • S Thilakavathi et al.

    Assessment of the scale, coverage and outcomes of the Avahan HIV prevention program for female sex workers in Tamil Nadu, India: is there evidence of an effect?

    BMC Public Health

    (2011)
  • L Ramakrishnan et al.

    Programme coverage, condom use and STI treatment among FSWs in a large-scale HIV prevention programme: results from cross-sectional surveys in 22 districts in southern India

    Sex Transm Infect

    (2010)
  • Cited by (230)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text